These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37927105)

  • 1. Local false discovery rate estimation with competition-based procedures for variable selection.
    Sun X; Fu Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 37927105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Null-free False Discovery Rate Control Using Decoy Permutations.
    He K; Li MJ; Fu Y; Gong FZ; Sun XM
    Acta Math Appl Sin; 2022; 38(2):235-253. PubMed ID: 35431377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False discovery rate-controlled multiple testing for union null hypotheses: a knockoff-based approach.
    Dai R; Zheng C
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3497-3509. PubMed ID: 36854821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Knockoff boosted tree for model-free variable selection.
    Jiang T; Li Y; Motsinger-Reif AA
    Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(7):976-983. PubMed ID: 32966559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition-based control of the false discovery proportion.
    Luo D; Ebadi A; Emery K; He Y; Noble WS; Keich U
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3472-3484. PubMed ID: 36652258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A powerful procedure that controls the false discovery rate with directional information.
    Tian Z; Liang K; Li P
    Biometrics; 2021 Mar; 77(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 32277471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A weighted FDR procedure under discrete and heterogeneous null distributions.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Sarkar SK
    Biom J; 2020 Oct; 62(6):1544-1563. PubMed ID: 32367597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems.
    Kim KI; van de Wiel MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():114. PubMed ID: 18298808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation.
    Strimmer K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():303. PubMed ID: 18613966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis.
    Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MULTILAYER KNOCKOFF FILTER: CONTROLLED VARIABLE SELECTION AT MULTIPLE RESOLUTIONS.
    Katsevich E; Sabatti C
    Ann Appl Stat; 2019 Mar; 13(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 31687060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
    Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
    Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DeepLINK: Deep learning inference using knockoffs with applications to genomics.
    Zhu Z; Fan Y; Kong Y; Lv J; Sun F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(36):. PubMed ID: 34480002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
    Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
    J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.