BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37927934)

  • 1. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis using the Japanese Nationwide diagnosis procedure combination database.
    Mizoguchi M; Kizuki M; Iwata N; Tokunaga M; Fushimi K; Kinugasa Y; Fujiwara T
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2023 Nov; 7(6):955-967. PubMed ID: 37927934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effect of peritoneum reconstruction on postoperative complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer].
    Gao LF; Chen DL; Chen BY; Li C; Wang XS; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 24(12):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 34923791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propensity score matching comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a middle-income country: short-term outcomes and cost analysis.
    Tayar DO; Ribeiro U; Cecconello I; Magalhães TM; Simões CM; Auler JOC
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2018; 10():521-527. PubMed ID: 30254479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.
    Matsuyama T; Endo H; Yamamoto H; Takemasa I; Uehara K; Hanai T; Miyata H; Kimura T; Hasegawa H; Kakeji Y; Inomata M; Kitagawa Y; Kinugasa Y
    BJS Open; 2021 Sep; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 34553225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Implementation of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery].
    Arteaga-González I; López-Tomassetti E; Martín-Malagón A; Díaz-Luis H; Carrillo-Pallares A
    Cir Esp; 2006 Mar; 79(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 16545281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
    de'Angelis N; Landi F; Vitali GC; Memeo R; Martínez-Pérez A; Solis A; Assalino M; Vallribera F; Mercoli HA; Marescaux J; Mutter D; Ris F; Espin E; Brunetti F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3106-3121. PubMed ID: 27826780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):959-969. PubMed ID: 36413257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
    Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Outcomes and Morbidity.
    Taylor JP; Stem M; Althumairi AA; Gearhart SL; Safar B; Fang SH; Efron JE
    World J Surg; 2020 Sep; 44(9):3130-3140. PubMed ID: 32383054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
    Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of long-term quality of life based on surgical procedure in patients with rectal cancer.
    Yuge K; Miwa K; Fujita F; Murotani K; Shigaki T; Yoshida N; Yoshida T; Koushi K; Fujiyoshi K; Nagasu S; Akagi Y
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1197131. PubMed ID: 37274255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: A nationwide retrospective analysis.
    Miyakawa T; Michihata N; Kumazawa R; Matsui H; Honda M; Yasunaga H
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2023 Jul; 16(3):376-385. PubMed ID: 36693819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis in Experienced Centers.
    Burghgraef TA; Crolla RMPH; Verheijen PM; Fahim M; van Geloven A; Leijtens JWA; Pronk A; Smits AB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Feb; 65(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34459449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effects of Hospital Volume on Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Large-Scale Analysis of 37,821 Cases on a Nationwide Administrative Database.
    Oba T; Tomioka S; Sato N; Otani M; Sakurai A; Akiyama Y; Nagata J; Torigoe T; Matsuda S; Hirata K
    Dig Surg; 2023; 40(1-2):39-47. PubMed ID: 36948158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Diagnostic Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage in Elderly Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Liu D; Zhou H; Liu L; Zhu Z; Liu S; Fang Y
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2021 Jul; 31(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 34292209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Odermatt M; Flashman K; Khan J; Parvaiz A
    Surg Today; 2016 Jul; 46(7):798-806. PubMed ID: 26342816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.