These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37928104)

  • 21. Renewing the respect for similarity.
    Edelman S; Shahbazi R
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2012; 6():45. PubMed ID: 22811664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effectiveness of measures requiring and not requiring prior sequence alignment for estimating the dissimilarity of natural sequences.
    Blaisdell BE
    J Mol Evol; 1989 Dec; 29(6):526-37. PubMed ID: 2515299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning from pairwise constraints by Similarity Neural Networks.
    Maggini M; Melacci S; Sarti L
    Neural Netw; 2012 Feb; 26():141-58. PubMed ID: 22055097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Molecular similarity measures.
    Maggiora GM; Shanmugasundaram V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 275():1-50. PubMed ID: 15141108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analyzing developmental sequences within a phylogenetic framework.
    Jeffery JE; Richardson MK; Coates MI; Bininda-Emonds OR
    Syst Biol; 2002 Jun; 51(3):478-91. PubMed ID: 12079645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extended many-item similarity indices for sets of nucleotide and protein sequences.
    Bajusz D; Miranda-Quintana RA; Rácz A; Héberger K
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():3628-3639. PubMed ID: 34257841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving the alignment quality of consistency based aligners with an evaluation function using synonymous protein words.
    Lin HN; Notredame C; Chang JM; Sung TY; Hsu WL
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e27872. PubMed ID: 22163274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal word sizes for dissimilarity measures and estimation of the degree of dissimilarity between DNA sequences.
    Wu TJ; Huang YH; Li LA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4125-32. PubMed ID: 16144805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Novel symmetry-based gene-gene dissimilarity measures utilizing Gene Ontology: Application in gene clustering.
    Acharya S; Saha S; Pradhan P
    Gene; 2018 Dec; 679():341-351. PubMed ID: 30184472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A neural network framework for similarity-based prognostics.
    Bektas O; Jones JA; Sankararaman S; Roychoudhury I; Goebel K
    MethodsX; 2019; 6():383-390. PubMed ID: 30859074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Similarity/dissimilarity analysis of protein structures based on Markov random fields.
    Wu J; Zhou T; Tao J; Hai Y; Ye F; Liu X; Dai Q
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Aug; 75():45-53. PubMed ID: 29747075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel model for DNA sequence similarity analysis based on graph theory.
    Qi X; Wu Q; Zhang Y; Fuller E; Zhang CQ
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2011; 7():149-58. PubMed ID: 22065497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Syntactic theory of mathematical expressions.
    Matsumoto D; Nakai T
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Nov; 146():101606. PubMed ID: 37748253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Special section on biomimetics of movement.
    Carpi F; Erb R; Jeronimidis G
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2011 Dec; 6(4):040201. PubMed ID: 22128305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evolutionary rates at codon sites may be used to align sequences and infer protein domain function.
    Durand PM; Hazelhurst S; Coetzer TL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 11():151. PubMed ID: 20334658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A mathematical framework for protein structure comparison.
    Liu W; Srivastava A; Zhang J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Feb; 7(2):e1001075. PubMed ID: 21304929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
    Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological evaluation of d2, an algorithm for high-performance sequence comparison.
    Hide W; Burke J; Davison DB
    J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(3):199-215. PubMed ID: 8790465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments.
    Panchenko AR; Bryant SH
    Protein Sci; 2002 Feb; 11(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 11790846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sequence conservation in families whose members have little or no sequence similarity: the four-helical cytokines and cytochromes.
    Hill EE; Morea V; Chothia C
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Sep; 322(1):205-33. PubMed ID: 12215425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.