These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37928878)

  • 1. Custom-made Subperiosteal Implants: A Finite Element Analysis on Monoblock and Dual Implant Systems in Atrophic Maxilla.
    Ayhan M; Cankaya AB
    Int J Med Sci; 2023; 20(13):1755-1762. PubMed ID: 37928878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rehabilitation of Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Pterygoid Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Wilkirson E; Chandran R; Duan Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):e51-e62. PubMed ID: 34115067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of titanium and Cfr-peek additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) on maxilla.
    Altıparmak N; Polat S; Onat S
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1S):101290. PubMed ID: 36152972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of a novel implant distribution to support maxillary overdentures.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e1-10. PubMed ID: 23377076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Extramaxillary Anchored Implants, Tilted Implants, or Sinus Elevation Concepts on Stress Distribution in Atrophic Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Yilmaz O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):563-570. PubMed ID: 35727249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of a one-piece zirconia implant in anterior single tooth implant applications.
    Talmazov G; Veilleux N; Abdulmajeed A; Bencharit S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229360. PubMed ID: 32092128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical effects of different fixed partial denture designs planned on bicortically anchored short, graft-supported long, or 45-degree-inclined long implants in the posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Seker E; Ulusoy M; Ozan O; Doğan DÖ; Seker BK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):e1-9. PubMed ID: 24451875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of stresses in monoblock tilted implants and conventional angled multiunit abutment-implant connection systems in the all-on-four procedure.
    Zincir ÖÖ; Parlar A
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):646. PubMed ID: 34915864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data.
    Kimura K; Fukase Y; Makino M; Masaki C; Nakamoto T; Hosokawa R
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():96-105. PubMed ID: 21495797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of sagittal root positions on the stress distribution around custom-made root-analogue implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lin C; Hu H; Zhu J; Wu Y; Rong Q; Tang Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):443. PubMed ID: 34521397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of implant-embedded maxilla model from CT data: comparison with the conventional model.
    Okumura N; Stegaroiu R; Nishiyama H; Kurokawa K; Kitamura E; Hayashi T; Nomura S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2011 Jan; 55(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 20933488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.