121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37929265)
1. Modeling Item Revisit Behavior: The Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model.
Bezirhan U; von Davier M; Grabovsky I
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):363-387. PubMed ID: 37929265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling item revisiting behavior in computer-based testing: Exploring the effect of item revisitations as collateral information.
Zhang J; Wang C; Lu J
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37608234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.
Becker B; Debeer D; Weirich S; Goldhammer F
Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Sep; 45(6):407-422. PubMed ID: 34565944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Mixture Hierarchical Model for Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.
Man K; Harring JR
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Oct; 83(5):1059-1080. PubMed ID: 37663535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
Huang HY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Repeated Exposure to Items.
O'Neill TR; Sun L; Peabody MR; Royal KD
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 26507998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Do Test Takers Interact With Simulation-Based Tasks? A Response-Time Perspective.
Lee YH; Hao J; Man K; Ou L
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():906. PubMed ID: 31068876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts.
Man K; Harring JR; Zhan P
Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jul; 46(5):361-381. PubMed ID: 35812811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clarifying the Effect of Test Speededness.
Hong MR; Cheng Y
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):611-623. PubMed ID: 31551639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.
Kanzow AF; Schmidt D; Kanzow P
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 May; 9():e44084. PubMed ID: 37001510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chinese College Test Takers' Individual Differences and Reading Test Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
Zhang L
Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Jun; 122(3):725-41. PubMed ID: 27173665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
Kern JL; Choe E
Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Multiprocess Item Response Model for Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits and Quitting.
Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):522-547. PubMed ID: 32425218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-adaptive testing: the impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions.
Tonidandel S; Quiñones MA; Adams AA
J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):320-32. PubMed ID: 12002960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Polytomous Scoring Approach to Handle Not-Reached Items in Low-Stakes Assessments.
Gorgun G; Bulut O
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 81(5):847-871. PubMed ID: 34421122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human ratings take time: A hierarchical facets model for the joint analysis of ratings and rating times.
Jin KY; Eckes T
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3535-3547. PubMed ID: 37919615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
