121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37929527)
1. Effect of simulated gastric acid on aesthetical restorative CAD-CAM materials' microhardness and flexural strength.
Gulakar TL; Comert GN; Karaman E; Cakan U; Ozel GS; Ahmet SO
Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1505-1511. PubMed ID: 37929527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of thermal and mechanical cycling on the mechanical strength and surface properties of dental CAD-CAM restorative materials.
Kim SH; Choi YS; Kang KH; Att W
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 33546857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations.
Furtado de Mendonca A; Shahmoradi M; Gouvêa CVD; De Souza GM; Ellakwa A
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e587-e594. PubMed ID: 30121945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of five CAD/CAM materials by microstructural characterization and mechanical tests: a comparative in vitro study.
Sonmez N; Gultekin P; Turp V; Akgungor G; Sen D; Mijiritsky E
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 29321010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of acidic pH on surface roughness of esthetic dental materials.
Alnasser M; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Suzuki M; Ghaffari R; Ali A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):567.e1-567.e8. PubMed ID: 31699448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of acidic media on flexural strength and fatigue of CAD-CAM dental materials.
Elraggal A; R Afifi R; Alamoush RA; Raheem IA; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2023 Jan; 39(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 36496258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term effects of simulated gastric juice alternated with brushing on hardness, substance loss, flexural strength and reliability of CAD-CAM monolithic materials.
Oliveira Junior JR; Cruz MEMD; Dovigo LN; Fonseca RG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2022; 30():e20210536. PubMed ID: 35507986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of erosive media on microhardness and fracture toughness of CAD-CAM dental materials.
Elraggal A; Afifi R; Abdelraheem I
BMC Oral Health; 2022 May; 22(1):191. PubMed ID: 35590294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials.
Goujat A; Abouelleil H; Colon P; Jeannin C; Pradelle N; Seux D; Grosgogeat B
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):384-389. PubMed ID: 28552287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials.
Ludovichetti FS; Trindade FZ; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Fonseca RG
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):318.e1-318.e8. PubMed ID: 30097264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of multiple firings on surface roughness and flexural strength of CAD-CAM ceramics.
Subaşı MG; Çakmak G; Sert M; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):216.e1-216.e8. PubMed ID: 35788273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Awada A; Nathanson D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 26141648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of coloring liquid immersion on flexural strength, Vickers hardness, and color of zirconia.
Donmez MB; Olcay EO; Demirel M
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):589.e1-589.e6. PubMed ID: 33423819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Functionally Graded PICN Material for Biomimetic CAD-CAM Blocks.
Eldafrawy M; Nguyen JF; Mainjot AK; Sadoun MJ
J Dent Res; 2018 Nov; 97(12):1324-1330. PubMed ID: 29975849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Mechanical and Optical Behaviors of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials.
Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Cengiz E; Ongun S; Karakaya I
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e496-e503. PubMed ID: 29323782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of storage and aging conditions on the flexural strength and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM materials.
Porto TS; Roperto RC; Akkus A; Akkus O; Teich S; Faddoul F; Porto-Neto ST; Campos EA
Dent Mater J; 2019 Mar; 38(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 30541991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of fracture strength of two chairside CAD/CAM ceramic blocs with different thickness].
Lin CG; Hu XK; Yan YX; Qu YH; Liu M; Zhang FM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Feb; 30(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 33907771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental fluorophlogopite glass ceramic.
Leung BT; Tsoi JK; Matinlinna JP; Pow EH
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):440-6. PubMed ID: 26013069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of simulated gastric juice on surface characteristics of CAD-CAM monolithic materials.
Cruz MEM; Simões R; Martins SB; Trindade FZ; Dovigo LN; Fonseca RG
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):483-490. PubMed ID: 31383520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
