124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37929789)
1. Embedding retrieval practice in undergraduate biochemistry teaching using PeerWise.
Higgins T; Dudley E; Bodger O; Newton P; Francis N
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2024; 52(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 37929789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PeerWise provides significant academic benefits to biological science students across diverse learning tasks, but with minimal instructor intervention.
McQueen HA; Shields C; Finnegan DJ; Higham J; Simmen MW
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2014; 42(5):371-81. PubMed ID: 24974789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: Enhancing student engagement and learning.
Nguyen KA; Lucas C; Leadbeatter D
Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 Aug; 24(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 32347592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using student authored and evaluated multiple-choice questions.
Bottomley S; Denny P
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2011; 39(5):352-61. PubMed ID: 21948507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving large class performance and engagement through student-generated question banks.
Hancock D; Hare N; Denny P; Denyer G
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2018 Jul; 46(4):306-317. PubMed ID: 29528559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.
Alamoudi AA; Al Shawwa LA; Gad H; Tekian A
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2021 Jul; 49(4):546-559. PubMed ID: 33729707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer generation of multiple-choice questions: student engagement and experiences.
Rhind SM; Pettigrew GW
J Vet Med Educ; 2012; 39(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 23187030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adopting a flipped classroom approach for teaching molar calculations to biochemistry and genetics students.
Francis N; Morgan A; Holm S; Davey R; Bodger O; Dudley E
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2020 May; 48(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31886932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study.
Craft JA; Christensen M; Shaw N; Bakon S
Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Dec; 59():6-11. PubMed ID: 28898728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Student Learning with Generated and Answered Peer-written Questions.
Hudson SL; Jarstfer MB; Persky AM
Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Mar; 82(2):6315. PubMed ID: 29606713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.
Smith CD; Dai A; Kenwright D; Grainger R
MedEdPublish (2016); 2020; 9():27. PubMed ID: 38058910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cord of four strands: Perspective of pre-medical and medical students on combined teaching modalities in undergraduate biochemistry.
Andrews S; Paul P; Chaari A
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2024; 52(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 37792403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning-oriented assessment increases performance and written skills in a second year metabolic biochemistry course.
Vanderlelie JJ; Alexander HG
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016 Jul; 44(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 27006292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scalable Science Education via Online Cooperative Questioning.
Hilton CB; Goldwater MB; Hancock D; Clemson M; Huang A; Denyer G
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2022 Mar; 21(1):ar4. PubMed ID: 34941363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of digital teaching resources and predictors of medical student performance during the pandemic: A prospective study.
Seer M; Kampsen C; Becker T; Hobert S; Anders S; Raupach T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268331. PubMed ID: 35544546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: a prospective cohort study.
Kühbeck F; Berberat PO; Engelhardt S; Sarikas A
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 19(1):412. PubMed ID: 31703687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
