These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3793070)
1. Public gains access to peer review data. Burda D Hospitals; 1987 Jan; 61(2):57. PubMed ID: 3793070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records. Peterson RN Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidentiality of peer review. Battaglia VF Del Med J; 1999 Mar; 71(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 10208062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. State access to peer review records: a clash of public policy. Singer AR; Willett DE Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):11-6. PubMed ID: 10294742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The latest word on confidentiality of peer review. Cronan CJ J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 96(12):491-3. PubMed ID: 9879179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal issues concerning peer review documents. Dunn LJ; Holbrook RF Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 10252576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laws vary on use of peer review records in litigation. Berliner MC Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10281935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer Review. Can the Board of Medical Practice subpoena your files? Mitchell LE; Bunde DP; Struthers MS; Wraspir KL; Moos RE Minn Med; 2000 Nov; 83(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 11126484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Closed peer review is best. Zingman EA Trustee; 1978 Jul; 31(7):50. PubMed ID: 10308590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review records: Canadian laws must be updated. Ferguson CG Dimens Health Serv; 1985; 62(9):16. PubMed ID: 4076627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal issues arising from peer review processes. Thomson C Aust Health Rev; 1986; 9(3):258-69. PubMed ID: 10279574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. VA hospital documents sought: suit threatens peer review privacy. Am Med News; 1979 Dec; 22(47):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10244813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Whose file is it anyway? Lalani S Can Doct; 1986 Sep; 52(9):GP29-30. PubMed ID: 10278440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach. Mills DH Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations. Mustes JJ; Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Washington State Supreme Court protects quality review committee records. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 10265237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job. Oliverio J Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]