These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37930902)

  • 1. Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling Approach for Simplified Reference Tissue Model.
    Shieh D; Matheson GJ; Ogden RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 Apr; 71(4):1191-1196. PubMed ID: 37930902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models for PET Data.
    Chen Y; Goldsmith J; Ogden RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Mar; 66(3):881-891. PubMed ID: 30072311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non linear mixed effects analysis in PET PK-receptor occupancy studies.
    Berges A; Cunningham VJ; Gunn RN; Zamuner S
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():155-66. PubMed ID: 23518008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of MNREAD data.
    Cheung SH; Kallie CS; Legge GE; Cheong AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 49(2):828-35. PubMed ID: 18235034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling for single cell estimation: when, why, and how to use it.
    Karlsson M; Janzén DL; Durrieu L; Colman-Lerner A; Kjellsson MC; Cedersund G
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 9():52. PubMed ID: 26335227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subject-specific prediction using nonlinear population modeling: application to early brain maturation from DTI.
    Sadeghi N; Fletcher PT; Prastawa M; Gilmore JH; Gerig G
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 3):33-40. PubMed ID: 25320779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the oxygen uptake kinetics during exercise testing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases using nonlinear mixed models.
    Baty F; Ritz C; van Gestel A; Brutsche M; Gerhard D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():66. PubMed ID: 27245328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Nonlinear Mixed Effects Approach for Modeling the Cell-To-Cell Variability of Mig1 Dynamics in Yeast.
    Almquist J; Bendrioua L; Adiels CB; Goksör M; Hohmann S; Jirstrand M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124050. PubMed ID: 25893847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of tenofovir plasma and tissue exposure using a population pharmacokinetic model and bootstrap: a simulation study from observed data.
    Collins JW; Heyward Hull J; Dumond JB
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2017 Dec; 44(6):631-640. PubMed ID: 29119381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formation of parametric images using mixed-effects models: a feasibility study.
    Huang HM; Shih YY; Lin C
    NMR Biomed; 2016 Mar; 29(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 26915793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stochastic nonlinear mixed effects: a metformin case study.
    Matzuka B; Chittenden J; Monteleone J; Tran H
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Feb; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 26585899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exact Gradients Improve Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models with Stochastic Dynamics.
    Olafsdottir HK; Leander J; Almquist J; Jirstrand M
    AAPS J; 2018 Aug; 20(5):88. PubMed ID: 30069613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model.
    Steimer JL; Mallet A; Golmard JL; Boisvieux JF
    Drug Metab Rev; 1984; 15(1-2):265-92. PubMed ID: 6745083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Filter inference: A scalable nonlinear mixed effects inference approach for snapshot time series data.
    Augustin D; Lambert B; Wang K; Walz AC; Robinson M; Gavaghan D
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 May; 19(5):e1011135. PubMed ID: 37216399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of IVGTT minimal glucose model by nonlinear mixed-effects approaches.
    Denti P; Bertoldo A; Vicini P; Cobelli C
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5049-52. PubMed ID: 17947129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a reference tissue model with spatial constraint to quantify [11C]Pittsburgh compound B PET for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
    Zhou Y; Resnick SM; Ye W; Fan H; Holt DP; Klunk WE; Mathis CA; Dannals R; Wong DF
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):298-312. PubMed ID: 17449282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial-volume correction in dynamic PET-CT: effect on tumor kinetic parameter estimation and validation of simplified metrics.
    Cysouw MCF; Golla SVS; Frings V; Smit EF; Hoekstra OS; Kramer GM; Boellaard R;
    EJNMMI Res; 2019 Feb; 9(1):12. PubMed ID: 30715647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using sensitivity equations for computing gradients of the FOCE and FOCEI approximations to the population likelihood.
    Almquist J; Leander J; Jirstrand M
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2015 Jun; 42(3):191-209. PubMed ID: 25801663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian analysis of nonlinear mixed-effects mixture models for longitudinal data with heterogeneity and skewness.
    Lu X; Huang Y
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2830-49. PubMed ID: 24623529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative assessment of linear least-squares, nonlinear least-squares, and Patlak graphical method for regional and local quantitative tracer kinetic modeling in cerebral dynamic
    Ben Bouallègue F; Vauchot F; Mariano-Goulart D
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1260-1271. PubMed ID: 30592540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.