156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37930916)
1. Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. Midterms.
Yang F; Cai M; Mortenson C; Fakhari H; Lokmanoglu AD; Hullman J; Franconeri S; Diakopoulos N; Nisbet EC; Kay M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Jan; 30(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 37930916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple Forecast Visualizations (MFVs): Trade-offs in Trust and Performance in Multiple COVID-19 Forecast Visualizations.
Padilla L; Fygenson R; Castro SC; Bertini E
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Jan; 29(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 36166555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Election cycles and global religious intolerance.
Nellis G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jan; 120(1):e2213198120. PubMed ID: 36580598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partisan mathematical processing of political polling statistics: It's the expectations that count.
Niemi L; Woodring M; Young L; Cordes S
Cognition; 2019 May; 186():95-107. PubMed ID: 30769197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age differences in affective forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 US presidential election.
Scheibe S; Mata R; Carstensen LL
Cogn Emot; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1029-44. PubMed ID: 21547760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Touching the base: heart-warming ads from the 2016 U.S. election moved viewers to partisan tears.
Seibt B; Schubert TW; Zickfeld JH; Fiske AP
Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 29510656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertain About Uncertainty: How Qualitative Expressions of Forecaster Confidence Impact Decision-Making With Uncertainty Visualizations.
Padilla LMK; Powell M; Kay M; Hullman J
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579267. PubMed ID: 33564298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy gains from conservative forecasting: Tests using variations of 19 econometric models to predict 154 elections in 10 countries.
Graefe A; Green KC; Armstrong JS
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209850. PubMed ID: 30629630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.
Gao M; Wang Z; Wang K; Liu C; Tang S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270194. PubMed ID: 35771877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.
Lench HC; Fernandez L; Reed N; Raibley E; Levine LJ; Salsedo K
Cogn Emot; 2024 May; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38764190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polarizing Political Polls: How Visualization Design Choices Can Shape Public Opinion and Increase Political Polarization.
Holder E; Bearfield CX
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Jan; 30(1):1446-1456. PubMed ID: 37871081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Core Beliefs Disruption in the Context of an Election: Implications for Subjective Well-Being.
Zhu X; Neupert SD
Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2546-2570. PubMed ID: 34098789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age differences in affective forecasting accuracy.
Barber SJ; Kausar H; Udry J
Psychol Aging; 2023 Aug; 38(5):357-373. PubMed ID: 36701521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combatting Election Stress: Anticipatory Coping and Daily Self-Reported Physical Health.
Johnson BK; Neupert SD
Psychol Rep; 2023 Mar; ():332941231165444. PubMed ID: 36939462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media.
Grant MD; Flores A; Pedersen EJ; Sherman DK; Van Boven L
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0259473. PubMed ID: 34851979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Moral Foundations and Voting Intention in Italy.
Milesi P
Eur J Psychol; 2017 Nov; 13(4):667-687. PubMed ID: 29358981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
