133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37930976)
1. Can MRI Help Inform Which Men With a History of Multifocal High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation Remain at an Elevated Risk for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer?
Sessine MS; Radoiu CS; Qi J; Labardee C; Burks F; George AK; Lane BR; Lim K; Dabaja A; Morgan TM; Cher ML; Semerjian AM; Ginsburg KB
J Urol; 2024 Feb; 211(2):234-240. PubMed ID: 37930976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeat Prostate Biopsy Practice Patterns in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
Burks FN; Hu JC; Telang D; Liu A; Hawken S; Montgomery Z; Linsell S; Montie JE; Miller DC; Ghani KR;
J Urol; 2017 Aug; 198(2):322-328. PubMed ID: 28257783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on prostate biopsy: a 5-year follow-up study.
O'Connor E; Dowling C; Casey M; O'Connor D; McHale T
Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 191(5):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 34799794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era.
Moore CK; Karikehalli S; Nazeer T; Fisher HA; Kaufman RP; Mian BM
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 15592031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple cores of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and any core of atypia on first biopsy are significant predictor for cancer detection at a repeat biopsy.
Kim TS; Ko KJ; Shin SJ; Ryoo HS; Song W; Sung HH; Han DH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee KS; Lee SW; Lee HM; Choi HY; Jeon HG
Korean J Urol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):796-802. PubMed ID: 26682019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy.
Girasole CR; Cookson MS; Putzi MJ; Chang SS; Smith JA; Wells N; Oppenheimer JR; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 16469583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The current recommendation for the management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
Morote J; Schwartzmann I; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semidey ME; Regis L; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):627-633. PubMed ID: 34375498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After a Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation, High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, or Benign Tissue.
Wiener S; Haddock P; Cusano J; Staff I; McLaughlin T; Wagner J
Urology; 2017 Dec; 110():161-165. PubMed ID: 28888752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Significance of atypical small acinar proliferation and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate biopsy in China].
Yang MG; Xu ZQ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Sep; 27(9):798-802. PubMed ID: 34914255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy.
Borboroglu PG; Sur RL; Roberts JL; Amling CL
J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):866-70. PubMed ID: 11490235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation and High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Should We Be Concerned? An Observational Cohort Study with a Minimum Follow-Up of 3 Years.
Srirangam V; Rai BP; Abroaf A; Agarwal S; Tadtayev S; Foley C; Lane T; Adshead J; Vasdev N
Curr Urol; 2017 Nov; 10(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 29234263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate adenocarcinoma detected after high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation.
López JI
BJU Int; 2007 Dec; 100(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 17850386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural history of widespread high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation: should we rebiopsy them all?
Oderda M; Rosazza M; Agnello M; Barale M; Calleris G; Daniele L; Delsedime L; Falcone M; Faletti R; Filippini C; Giordano A; Marquis A; Marra G; Pacchioni D; Gontero P
Scand J Urol; 2021 Apr; 55(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 33410348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative prostate biopsy: The current value of microscopic findings.
Morote J; Schwartzman I; Borque A; Esteban LM; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semidey ME; Regis L; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):432.e11-432.e19. PubMed ID: 33160846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation on initial 21-core extended biopsy scheme: incidence and implications for patient care and surveillance.
Ploussard G; Plennevaux G; Allory Y; Salomon L; Azoulay S; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
World J Urol; 2009 Oct; 27(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 19373471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The current value of histological findings in negative prostate biopsies to predict the future risk of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Schwartzmann I; Celma A; Regis L; Planas J; Roche S; de Torres IM; Semidey ME; Morote J
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2021; 45(6):447-454. PubMed ID: 34140257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.
Schoenfield L; Jones JS; Zippe CD; Reuther AM; Klein E; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):770-4. PubMed ID: 17233800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical small acinar proliferation and two or more cores of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia on a previous prostate biopsy are significant predictors of cancer during a transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy aimed at sampling one core for each 1 mL of prostate volume.
Nakai Y; Tanaka N; Miyake M; Hori S; Tatsumi Y; Morizawa Y; Fujii T; Konishi N; Fujimoto K
Res Rep Urol; 2017; 9():187-193. PubMed ID: 29034221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial diagnosis of insignificant cancer, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical small acinar proliferation, and negative have the same rate of upgrade to a Gleason score of 7 or higher on repeat prostate biopsy.
Prathibha S; Goyal KG; Zynger DL
Hum Pathol; 2018 Sep; 79():116-121. PubMed ID: 29803813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric MR can identify high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) lesions and predict future detection of prostate cancer in men with a negative initial prostate biopsy.
Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Bora GS; Sharma S; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 34(8):1081-6. PubMed ID: 27211254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
