These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37931096)

  • 21. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes.
    Hanski I; Ovaskainen O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Aug; 64(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 12804876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metapopulation persistence in fragmented landscapes: significant interactions between genetic and demographic processes.
    Theodorou K; Souan H; Couvet D
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 19120816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applications of Rapid Evaluation of Metapopulation Persistence (REMP) in Conservation Planning for Vulnerable Fauna Species.
    Taylor S; Drielsma M; Taylor R; Kumar L
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 57(6):1281-91. PubMed ID: 26902481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Habitat destruction, habitat restoration and eigenvector-eigenvalue relations.
    Ovaskainen O
    Math Biosci; 2003 Feb; 181(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 12445760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of population model choice and network topologies on extinction time patterns in dendritic ecological networks.
    Ekanayake EMEK; Angus Webb J; Stewardson MJ
    J Theor Biol; 2023 Jan; 556():111314. PubMed ID: 36252842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation of metapopulation colonization rates from disturbance history and occurrence-pattern data.
    Fabritius H; Singer A; Pennanen J; Snäll T
    Ecology; 2019 Oct; 100(10):e02814. PubMed ID: 31290140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Local connections and the larval competency strongly influence marine metapopulation persistence.
    Cecino G; Treml EA
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jun; 31(4):e02302. PubMed ID: 33565673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measuring impacts on species with models and metrics of varying ecological and computational complexity.
    Hallam CD; Wintle BA; Kujala H; Whitehead AL; Nicholson E
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1512-1524. PubMed ID: 32390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Population dynamics of epiphytic orchids in a metapopulation context.
    Winkler M; Hülber K; Hietz P
    Ann Bot; 2009 Oct; 104(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 19671576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of connectivity on metapopulation persistence: network symmetry and degree correlations.
    Shtilerman E; Stone L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 May; 282(1806):20150203. PubMed ID: 25833858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatiotemporal connectivity dynamics in spatially structured populations.
    Drake J; Lambin X; Sutherland C
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Oct; 91(10):2050-2060. PubMed ID: 35871483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Integrating social and ecological data to model metapopulation dynamics in coupled human and natural systems.
    Van Schmidt ND; Kovach T; Kilpatrick AM; Oviedo JL; Huntsinger L; Hruska T; Miller NL; Beissinger SR
    Ecology; 2019 Jun; 100(6):e02711. PubMed ID: 30927267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of spatial structure in at-risk metapopulation recoveries.
    Wilson KL; Sawyer AC; Potapova A; Bailey CJ; LoScerbo D; Sweeney-Bergen EK; Hodgson EE; Pitman KJ; Seitz KM; Law LK; Warkentin L; Wilson SM; Atlas WI; Braun DC; Sloat MR; Tinker MT; Moore JW
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Sep; 33(6):e2898. PubMed ID: 37303288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Merging spatial and temporal structure within a metapopulation model.
    DeWoody YD; Feng Z; Swihart RK
    Am Nat; 2005 Jul; 166(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 15937788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology.
    Howell PE; Muths E; Hossack BR; Sigafus BH; Chandler RB
    Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 29453767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using metapopulation theory for practical conservation of mangrove endemic birds.
    Huang R; Pimm SL; Giri C
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):266-275. PubMed ID: 31183898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The three regimes of spatial recovery.
    Zelnik YR; Arnoldi JF; Loreau M
    Ecology; 2019 Feb; 100(2):e02586. PubMed ID: 30556129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metapopulation dynamics and future persistence of epiphytic cyanolichens in a European boreal forest ecosystem.
    Fedrowitz K; Kuusinen M; Snäll T
    J Appl Ecol; 2012 Apr; 49(2):493-502. PubMed ID: 22745512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evolution reverses the effect of network structure on metapopulation persistence.
    McManus LC; Tekwa EW; Schindler DE; Walsworth TE; Colton MA; Webster MM; Essington TE; Forrest DL; Palumbi SR; Mumby PJ; Pinsky ML
    Ecology; 2021 Jul; 102(7):e03381. PubMed ID: 33942289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantifying the importance of patch-specific changes in habitat to metapopulation viability of an endangered songbird.
    Horne JS; Strickler KM; Alldredge M
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22073637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.