These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3793111)
1. The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments. McGreevy MW; Ellis SR Hum Factors; 1986 Aug; 28(4):439-56. PubMed ID: 3793111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Situation awareness as a function of frame of reference, computer-graphics eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view. Barfield W; Rosenberg C; Furness TA 3rd Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(3):233-56. PubMed ID: 11541915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Control reversal using helmet-mounted displays. Stevenson JD Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Sep; 73(9):939; author reply 939-40. PubMed ID: 12234051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pilot disorientation and the use of a peripheral vision display. The 1983 Annual Harry G. Armstrong Lecture. Malcolm R Aviat Space Environ Med; 1984 Mar; 55(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 6721811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Spatial-frequency characteristics of receptive fields of the cat visual cortex on homogeneous and nonhomogeneous backgrounds]. Glezer VD; Gauzel'man VE; Bondarko VM; Shcherbach TA Biofizika; 1982; 27(5):871-4. PubMed ID: 7138938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superimposition, symbology, visual attention, and the head-up display. Martin-Emerson R; Wickens CD Hum Factors; 1997 Dec; 39(4):581-601. PubMed ID: 11536851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of weightlessness on the functions of perception and the reproduction of gravitational vertical in response to optokinetic stimulation]. Sokolov AI; Barmin VA Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1988; 22(5):24-7. PubMed ID: 3226103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of changes in spatial position. IV. Multiple display fields, display aiding, and interference. Pollack I Hum Factors; 1974 Apr; 16(2):93-116. PubMed ID: 4844756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling. Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial information and temporal representation in memory. Hill OW; Moadab MH Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 2):1339-43. PubMed ID: 8684934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hyperbolic geometry as an alternative to perspective for constructing drawings of visual space. Finch D Perception; 1977; 6(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 876826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychological aspects of pilot spatial orientation. Kovalenko PA ICAO J; 1991 Mar; 46(3):18-23. PubMed ID: 11539341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of geometric parameters of perspective on judgements of spatial information. Barfield W; Kim Y Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Oct; 73(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 1766795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The unitage used for the display of ballistocardiographic amplitudes. Proper R Bibl Cardiol; 1969; 24():3-6. PubMed ID: 5771551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Laboratory apparatus for studying visual space perception of the pilot in simulated night approaches to landing. Mertens HW Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1331-6. PubMed ID: 604920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention. Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. COMBINATION OF INFORMATION IN SUPERIMPOSED VISUAL FIELDS. NAISH JM Nature; 1964 May; 202():641-6. PubMed ID: 14190022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]