These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37931746)

  • 1. Coming to grips with reality: Real grasps, but not pantomimed grasps, resist a simultaneous tilt illusion.
    Whitwell RL; Hasan HA; MacNeil RR; Enns JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Dec; 191():108726. PubMed ID: 37931746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.
    Whitwell RL; Ganel T; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():216. PubMed ID: 25999834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.
    Chan J; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 28070622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nothing magical: pantomimed grasping is controlled by the ventral system.
    Rinsma T; van der Kamp J; Dicks M; Cañal-Bruland R
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1823-1833. PubMed ID: 28299409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational requirements, not gaze-mediated attention, explain a classic perception-action dissociation.
    Whitwell RL; Garach MA; Goodale MA; Sperandio I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210459. PubMed ID: 36511402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Haptic Expectations in Reaching to Grasp: From Pantomime to Natural Grasps and Back Again.
    Whitwell RL; Katz NJ; Goodale MA; Enns JT
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():588428. PubMed ID: 33391110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spatial relations between stimulus and response determine an absolute visuo-haptic calibration in pantomime-grasping.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Jun; 114():29-39. PubMed ID: 28346879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
    Katsumata H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Sander parallelogram illusion dissociates action and perception despite control for the litany of past confounds.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA; Merritt KE; Enns JT
    Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():163-176. PubMed ID: 29100659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinct visual resolution supports aperture shaping in natural and pantomime-grasping.
    Heath M; Ayala N; Hamidi M; Tari B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 34694839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of the Sander parallelogram illusion and early, middle and late vision on goal-directed reaching and grasping.
    Carther-Krone TA; Senanayake SA; Marotta JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Dec; 238(12):2993-3003. PubMed ID: 33095294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.
    Kuntz JR; Karl JM; Doan JB; Whishaw IQ
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 236(4):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29441469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand.
    Gonzalez CL; Ganel T; Whitwell RL; Morrissey B; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):624-31. PubMed ID: 17950763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priming of the Sander Parallelogram illusion separates perception from action.
    Senanayake SA; Carther-Krone T; Marotta JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 Jul; 239(7):2207-2220. PubMed ID: 34013396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action and perception.
    Whitwell RL; Buckingham G; Enns JT; Chouinard PA; Goodale MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1157-63. PubMed ID: 26555756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does visuomotor adaptation contribute to illusion-resistant grasping?
    Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Taylor JA; Domini F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):827-845. PubMed ID: 28853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.
    Glover SR; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):560-72. PubMed ID: 11424646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.