These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 379319)

  • 1. Cost analysis of relined mercaptan rubber impressions.
    Gullett CE; Podshadley AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):180-2. PubMed ID: 379319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reline technic for mercaptan rubber impressions.
    Gullett CE; Podshadley AG
    Oper Dent; 1978; 3(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 397481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of a mercaptan rubber impression technique using a stock tray.
    Podshadley AG; Dilts WE; Neiman R; Sawyer HF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1971 Dec; 83(6):1303-8. PubMed ID: 4940403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate denture impression technique using zinc-oxide and eugenol and rubber base impression material.
    Chaney SA
    Dent J; 1977 Mar; 43(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 323026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of pouring mercaptan rubber impressions at various intervals after separation.
    Podshadley AG; Birtles JT; Neiman R; Dilts WE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Jul; 28(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 4556032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of relined mercaptan-rubber impressions.
    Podshadley AG; Dilts WE; Neiman R; Ellison E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Nov; 24(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 5273653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics. Part 2: Immediate denture and reline impressions.
    Cagna DR; Massad JJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Sep; 28(9):519-26; quiz 527-8. PubMed ID: 17907375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DOUBLE BAND RUBBER IMPRESSIONS.
    HIRSHBERG SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1965; 15():704-9. PubMed ID: 14313318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a rubber-base impression material.
    Gunther G; Welsh SI
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Jan; 39(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 340664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of elastomeric impression materials for crown and bridgework.
    Hwe CY; Soo TC
    Singapore Dent J; 1987 Dec; 12(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 3334539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular complete denture impressions with fluid wax or polysulfide rubber: a comparative study.
    Firtell DN; Koumjian JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 1403864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elasticity of impression materials: IV. Permanent deformation as a function of time.
    Kaloyannides TM; Christidou L
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 1053758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elastomeric impression materials, trays and associated costs.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA
    J Mo Dent Assoc (1980); 1983; 63(1):32-3, 35-6. PubMed ID: 6337265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Changes of ciscoelastic behaviour during curing of polyether rubber impression material].
    Inoue K; Hayashi I; Kakigawa H; Sugino Y; Terashita M
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1976 Jan; 17(37):44-50. PubMed ID: 1063232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative cost study of various types of impression materials and technics for use in fixed prosthodontics].
    Torrella F; Gascon F
    Rev Actual Estomatol Esp; 1985 Oct; 45(350):27-35. PubMed ID: 3915564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional impressions with thermoplastic materials for reline procedures.
    Fitzloff RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jul; 52(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 6379160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.