115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37932975)
1. Maturity degree assessment of hospital ward system using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model.
Li L; Tong J; Wang H; Ren R; Xiong L; Wang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(44):e35752. PubMed ID: 37932975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance Analysis of Hospital Managers Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS: Iranian Experience.
Shafii M; Hosseini SM; Arab M; Asgharizadeh E; Farzianpour F
Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Jun; 8(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 26383216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of product conceptual design based on Pythagorean fuzzy set under big data environment.
Ma LD; Wang WX; Xie JW; Zhang N; Hu NF; Wang ZA
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22387. PubMed ID: 36575300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating modern intrusion detection methods in the face of Gen V multi-vector attacks with fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS.
Alhakami W
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302559. PubMed ID: 38743732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing and overcoming the barriers for healthcare waste management in India: an integrated AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS approach.
Raj A; Samuel C
J Health Organ Manag; 2023 Oct; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):. PubMed ID: 37819432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrated fuzzy approach for strategic alliance partner selection in third-party logistics.
Erkayman B; Gundogar E; Yilmaz A
ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():486306. PubMed ID: 23365520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A proposed theoretical framework.
Zhou R; Chan AH
Work; 2017; 56(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 28035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying, evaluating and prioritizing the causes of occupational accidents in the construction industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS.
Abbasinia M; Mohammadfam I
Work; 2022; 72(3):933-940. PubMed ID: 35634821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tunnel collapse risk assessment based on improved quantitative theory III and EW-AHP coupling weight.
Li L; Ni B; Zhang S; Qiang Y; Zhang Z; Zhou L; Liu G; Cheng L
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16054. PubMed ID: 36163228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Securing healthcare information system through fuzzy based decision-making methodology.
Alharbi A; Ahmad M; Alosaimi W; Alyami H; Sarkar AK; Agrawal A; Kumar R; Khan RA
Health Informatics J; 2022; 28(4):14604582221135420. PubMed ID: 36374584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional Water Resources Security Evaluation Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS Method.
Tu Y; Chen K; Wang H; Li Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32664379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals.
Ortiz-Barrios M; Gul M; López-Meza P; Yucesan M; Navarro-Jiménez E
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct; 2020 Oct; 49():101748. PubMed ID: 32834973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of community basic public health service effect in a city in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region--based on entropy weight TOPSIS method and RSR fuzzy set.
Dai X; Jiang Y; Li Y; Wang X; Wang R; Zhang Y
Arch Public Health; 2023 Aug; 81(1):149. PubMed ID: 37592329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pandemic hospital site selection: a GIS-based MCDM approach employing Pythagorean fuzzy sets.
Boyacı AÇ; Şişman A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(2):1985-1997. PubMed ID: 34357491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The data on the effective qualifications of teachers in medical sciences: An application of combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
Khoshi A; Shams Gooshki H; Mahmoudi N
Data Brief; 2018 Dec; 21():2689-2693. PubMed ID: 30761352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occupational health and safety risk assessment using a fuzzy multi-criteria approach in a hospital in Chennai, India.
Badida P; Janakiraman S; Jayaprakash J
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 36004476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
