120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37932975)
21. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based risk priority number for risk assessments of commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC.
Chang J; Jang S; Lalonde R; Huq SM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 23(11):e13760. PubMed ID: 35998202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in the process industry.
Yazdi M; Korhan O; Daneshvar S
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Jun; 26(2):319-335. PubMed ID: 29557291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.
Liu F; Zhang WG
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1283-94. PubMed ID: 24081882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A test case.
Zhou R; Chan AH
Work; 2017; 56(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 28035942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.
Pathan AI; Girish Agnihotri P; Said S; Patel D
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(7):509. PubMed ID: 35713716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating the sustainability of big data centers using the analytic network process and fuzzy TOPSIS.
Zhang Q; Yang S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17913-17927. PubMed ID: 33410015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital.
Moradi T; Jafari M; Maleki MR; Naghdi S; Ghiasvand H
Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Jul; 8(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 26493411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Action selection in risk assessment with fuzzy Fine-Kinney-based AHP-TOPSIS approach: a case study in gas plant.
Dogan B; Oturakci M; Dagsuyu C
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(44):66222-66234. PubMed ID: 35499730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems.
Uzoka FM; Obot O; Barker K; Osuji J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 20633949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. State-of-the-art on analytic hierarchy process in the last 40 years: Literature review based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modelling.
Madzík P; Falát L
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268777. PubMed ID: 35622850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Integration of fuzzy set theory and TOPSIS into HFMEA to improve outpatient service for elderly patients in Taiwan.
Kuo RJ; Wu YH; Hsu TS
J Chin Med Assoc; 2012 Jul; 75(7):341-8. PubMed ID: 22824049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Model for the Development of Hospital Beds Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP).
Ravangard R; Bahadori M; Raadabadi M; Teymourzadeh E; Alimomohammadzadeh K; Mehrabian F
Iran J Public Health; 2017 Nov; 46(11):1555-1562. PubMed ID: 29167775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Weighting Criteria and Prioritizing of Heat stress indices in surface mining using a Delphi Technique and Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method.
Asghari M; Nassiri P; Monazzam MR; Golbabaei F; Arabalibeik H; Shamsipour A; Allahverdy A
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():1. PubMed ID: 28101366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.
Akcan S; Güldeş M
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():5614892. PubMed ID: 31687120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods for Wire Electric Discharge Machining of Titanium (Ti6Al4V) Alloy Using RSM.
Fuse K; Dalsaniya A; Modi D; Vora J; Pimenov DY; Giasin K; Prajapati P; Chaudhari R; Wojciechowski S
Materials (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 34885563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Research on assessment methods for urban public transport development in China.
Zou L; Dai H; Yao E; Jiang T; Guo H
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2014; 2014():941347. PubMed ID: 25530756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
