These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3793331)

  • 1. Accuracy of an anthropometric estimate of the muscle and bone area in a transversal cross-section of the arm.
    de Koning FL; Binkhorst RA; Kauer JM; Thijssen HO
    Int J Sports Med; 1986 Oct; 7(5):246-9. PubMed ID: 3793331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upper arm measurements of healthy neonates comparing ultrasonography and anthropometric methods.
    Pereira-da-Silva L; Veiga Gomes J; Clington A; Videira-Amaral JM; Bustamante SA
    Early Hum Dev; 1999 Mar; 54(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 10213290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: revised equations for calculating bone-free arm muscle area.
    Heymsfield SB; McManus C; Smith J; Stevens V; Nixon DW
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1982 Oct; 36(4):680-90. PubMed ID: 7124671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of mid-arm muscular area measured by anthropometry in nonobese patients with increased muscle atrophy and variation of subcutaneous fat thickness.
    Saito R; Ohkawa S; Ichinose S; Nishikino M; Ikegaya N; Kumagai H
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2010 Aug; 64(8):899-904. PubMed ID: 20502470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of anthropometric estimation of muscle cross-sectional area of the arm in males.
    Martine T; Claessens AL; Vlietinck R; Marchal G; Beunen G
    Am J Hum Biol; 1997; 9(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 28561488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upper arm anthropometric norms in elderly white subjects.
    Falciglia G; O'Connor J; Gedling E
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1988 May; 88(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 3367013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of upper arm muscle and fat areas using electrical impedance measurements.
    Brown BH; Karatzas T; Nakielny R; Clarke RG
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 3359744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of triceps skinfold and upper arm circumference measurements taken in standard and supine positions.
    Jensen TG; Dudrick SJ; Johnston DA
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1981; 5(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 7199591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A radiographic method of quantifying protein-calorie undernutrition.
    Heymsfield SB; Olafson RP; Kutner MH; Nixon DW
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Mar; 32(3):693-702. PubMed ID: 105625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arm muscle plus bone area: anthropometry and CAT scan compared.
    Forbes GB; Brown MR; Griffiths HJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1988 Jun; 47(6):929-31. PubMed ID: 3376908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference values for arm muscle area, arm fat area, subscapular skinfold thickness, and sum of skinfold thicknesses for American adults.
    Bishop CW
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984; 8(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 6541716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship of arm girth measurements with roentgenogrammetric and caliper measurements of subcutaneous fat at triceps and biceps in adult male volunteers.
    Singh R
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1967; 59(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 5607814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of the measurement of the circumference of arm, arm muscle area and skinfold thickness during puberty.
    Derman O; Yalcin SS; Kanbur NO; Kinik E
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2002; 14(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12467194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anthropometric and computerized tomographic measurements of lower extremity lean body mass.
    Buckley DC; Kudsk KA; Rose BS; Fatzinger P; Koetting CA; Schlatter M
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1987 Feb; 87(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 3819239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of percentage body fat in rural thai population using simple anthropometric measurements.
    Pongchaiyakul C; Kosulwat V; Rojroongwasinkul N; Charoenkiatkul S; Thepsuthammarat K; Laopaiboon M; Nguyen TV; Rajatanavin R
    Obes Res; 2005 Apr; 13(4):729-38. PubMed ID: 15897482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of bone and muscle components of upper arm from its surface measurements.
    Kansal DK; Sidhu LS; Verma SK
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1980; 71(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 7314781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status.
    Frisancho AR
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1981 Nov; 34(11):2540-5. PubMed ID: 6975564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A revised equation for estimating thigh muscle and bone area from anthropometric dimensions.
    Tanaka S; Shiraki H; Machida N
    Am J Hum Biol; 1992; 4(4):447-452. PubMed ID: 28524395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inheritance of static and dynamic arm strength and some of its determinants.
    Thomis MA; Beunen GP; Van Leemputte M; Maes HH; Blimkie CJ; Claessens AL; Marchal G; Willems E; Vlietinck RF
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1998 May; 163(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 9648624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of surface anthropometry to estimate upper-arm muscularity, including changes with body mass loss.
    Katch FI; Hortobagyi T
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1990 Oct; 52(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 2403053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.