These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37933561)

  • 21. The Court is ignoring science.
    Foster DG
    Science; 2022 May; 376(6595):779. PubMed ID: 35575724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pushing Back with Pills - Enhancing Access to Reproductive Health Drugs after
    Grossman LA
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Sep; 387(12):1056-1058. PubMed ID: 36121044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cruzan after Dobbs: What Remains of the Constitutional Right to Refuse Treatment?
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2023 Mar; 53(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 37092653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Permanent Procedures to Prevent Pregnancy in US Jumped After Dobbs.
    Harris E
    JAMA; 2024 Jun; 331(21):1795-1796. PubMed ID: 38728041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
    Clark BR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protecting marginalized women's mental health in the post-Dobbs era.
    Nguyen D; Bajaj SS; Ahmed D; Stanford FC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(40):e2212012119. PubMed ID: 36149969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. From
    Owens JA; Lilly FRW; Allen A; Falcon M; Ward RJ
    Am J Public Health; 2023 Dec; 113(12):1241-1243. PubMed ID: 37939341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recruiting and retention of physicians after Dobbs vs. Jackson- the worst is yet to come.
    Thomas SP; Kruse DE; Houk JL; Minkemeyer VM; Jaffe TA
    Clin Imaging; 2023 May; 97():68-69. PubMed ID: 36905885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implications of the Dobbs Decision for Medical Education: Inadequate Training and Moral Distress.
    Mengesha B; Zite N; Steinauer J
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1697-1698. PubMed ID: 36318119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Supreme Court watch: redistricting commissions and federal health care exchanges are the focus of two important cases now in the hands of Supreme Court justices.
    Soronen L
    State Legis; 2015 Apr; 41(4):19. PubMed ID: 25946755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protecting our Patients and Trainees: The Complex Consequences of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Ruling.
    Ponce SB; Bajaj A; Baniel C; Seldon C; Sim A; Franco I; Pinnix C; Fields E; Jimenez RB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 Nov; 114(3):393-395. PubMed ID: 35963469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Olmstead decision and the journey toward integration:the evolution of social work responses.
    Yong F
    J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):115-26. PubMed ID: 17804363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
    Abeles N
    Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Medicaid, the Supreme Court, and Safe Care for Nursing Home Residents.
    Huberfeld N
    JAMA; 2023 Jan; 329(1):17-18. PubMed ID: 36484994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Institutional hybridity and policy-motivated reasoning structure public evaluations of the Supreme Court.
    Gadarian SK; Strother L
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294525. PubMed ID: 37992008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Withdrawal and withholding of medical treatment for patients lacking capacity who are in a critical condition--reflections on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James.
    Wise I
    Med Leg J; 2014 Dec; 82(4):144-54. PubMed ID: 25349194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
    Herbert PB; Meyers JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Seeking vasectomy in post-Dobbs America: the male counterpart response to the reversal of Roe v Wade as evidenced by Google search trends.
    Sax MR
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Dec; 118(6):1189. PubMed ID: 36369185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.