These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37935060)

  • 1. Comparison of the diagnostic yield of 3 and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy forceps in cats.
    Dobberstein REA; Brisson BA; Foster RA; Monteith G; Larose PC; Rankovic A; Verbrugghe A; Shoveller AK
    Vet Surg; 2024 Feb; 53(2):302-310. PubMed ID: 37935060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic twist technique has the best overall artifact profile when comparing three laparoscopic hepatic cup biopsy techniques for dogs.
    Buote NJ; Loftus JP; Miller AD
    Am J Vet Res; 2022 Nov; 83(12):. PubMed ID: 36318536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic 3 mm and 5 mm cup biopsies to wedge biopsies of canine livers.
    Kimbrell TL; Milovancev M; Olsen R; Löhr CV
    J Vet Intern Med; 2018 Mar; 32(2):701-706. PubMed ID: 29460333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs.
    Larose PC; Brisson BA; Foster RA; Monteith G
    Vet Surg; 2024 May; 53(4):742-753. PubMed ID: 37530591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two minimally invasive techniques for liver biopsy collection in dogs.
    Fernandez N; Del-Pozo J; Shaw D; Marques AIC
    J Small Anim Pract; 2017 Oct; 58(10):555-561. PubMed ID: 28737268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic pancreatic biopsies in 11 healthy cats.
    Cosford KL; Shmon CL; Myers SL; Taylor SM; Carr AP; Steiner JM; Suchodolski JS; Mantovani F
    J Vet Intern Med; 2010; 24(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 19925571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of liver sampling techniques in dogs.
    Kemp SD; Zimmerman KL; Panciera DL; Monroe WE; Leib MS; Lanz OI
    J Vet Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25417960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.
    Cartwright JA; Hill TL; Smith S; Shaw D
    J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 30(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 27255591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.
    Sussman DA; Deshpande AR; Shankar U; Barkin JA; Medina AM; Poppiti RJ; Cubeddu LX; Barkin JS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Aug; 61(8):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 27003145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical views: techniques for laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted biopsy of abdominal organs.
    Mayhew P
    Compend Contin Educ Vet; 2009 Apr; 31(4):170-6. PubMed ID: 19517409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic splenic biopsy in dogs and cats: 15 cases (2006-2008).
    Radhakrishnan A; Mayhew PD
    J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2013; 49(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 23148132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term clinical outcome of laparoscopic liver biopsy in dogs: 106 cases (2003-2013).
    McDevitt HL; Mayhew PD; Giuffrida MA; Brown DC; Culp WT; Runge JJ
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2016 Jan; 248(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 26684095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An observer-blinded, prospective, randomized comparison of forceps for endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
    Schafer TW; Hollis-Perry KM; Mondragon RM; Brann OS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11818921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 2 differently sized endoscopic biopsy forceps in the evaluation of intestinal disease in cats.
    Bottero E; Mussi E; Pieramati C; De Lorenzi D; Silvestri S; Lepri E
    J Vet Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 33(2):523-530. PubMed ID: 30556184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study.
    Woods KL; Anand BS; Cole RA; Osato MS; Genta RM; Malaty H; Gurer IE; Rossi DD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 9925695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of routinely used intestinal biopsy forceps in dogs: an ex vivo histopathological approach.
    Dahan J; Semin MO; Monton C; Amiriantz S; Concordet D; Raymond-Letron I; Dossin O
    J Small Anim Pract; 2017 Mar; 58(3):162-167. PubMed ID: 28267217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted technique and open laparotomy for gastrointestinal biopsy in cats.
    McClaran JK; Skerrett SC; Currao RL; Pavia PR; Tarvin KM
    Vet Surg; 2017 Aug; 46(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 28481049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatic biopsy in dogs: 80 cases (2004-2009).
    Petre SL; McClaran JK; Bergman PJ; Monette S
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Jan; 240(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 22217026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic comparison of needle and wedge biopsy specimens of the liver in dogs and cats.
    Cole TL; Center SA; Flood SN; Rowland PH; Valentine BA; Warner KL; Erb HN
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 May; 220(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 12018374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of standard single-bite with multiple-bite biopsy forceps for collection of gastrointestinal biopsies in dogs: a prospective study.
    Edery EG; Scase T; Kisielewicz C; Dhumeaux MP
    Vet Rec; 2018 Nov; 183(20):624. PubMed ID: 30115670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.