These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37935365)

  • 1. Guides and cheats: producer-scrounger dynamics in the human-honeyguide mutualism.
    Cram DL; Lloyd-Jones DJ; van der Wal JEM; Lund J; Buanachique IO; Muamedi M; Nanguar CI; Ngovene A; Raveh S; Boner W; Spottiswoode CN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Nov; 290(2010):20232024. PubMed ID: 37935365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When wax wanes: competitors for beeswax stabilize rather than jeopardize the honeyguide-human mutualism.
    Lloyd-Jones DJ; St Clair JJH; Cram DL; Yassene O; van der Wal JEM; Spottiswoode CN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Nov; 289(1987):20221443. PubMed ID: 36448420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reciprocal signaling in honeyguide-human mutualism.
    Spottiswoode CN; Begg KS; Begg CM
    Science; 2016 Jul; 353(6297):387-9. PubMed ID: 27463674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.
    Reichert MS; Morand-Ferron J; Kulahci IG; Firth JA; Davidson GL; Crofts SJ; Quinn JL
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2497-2509. PubMed ID: 34091901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.
    Aplin LM; Morand-Ferron J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Apr; 284(1852):. PubMed ID: 28404775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Food-caching chickadees with specialized spatial cognition do not use scrounging as a stable strategy when learning a spatial task.
    Heinen VK; Pitera AM; Sonnenberg BR; Branch CL; Benedict LM; Welklin JF; Whitenack LE; Bridge ES; Pravosudov VV
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Jul; 290(2002):20230900. PubMed ID: 37434529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An asymmetric producer-scrounger game: body size and the social foraging behavior of coho salmon.
    Phillips JA; Peacock SJ; Bateman A; Bartlett M; Lewis MA; Krkošek M
    Theor Ecol; 2018; 11(4):417-431. PubMed ID: 30931016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer-scrounger equilibria.
    Mottley K; Giraldeau LA
    Anim Behav; 2000 Sep; 60(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 11007643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of exploration on the use of producer-scrounger tactics.
    Kurvers RH; Hamblin S; Giraldeau LA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49400. PubMed ID: 23185327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skill trade-offs promote persistent individual differences and specialized tactics.
    Dubois F
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e10578. PubMed ID: 37809359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more.
    Kurvers RH; Prins HH; van Wieren SE; van Oers K; Nolet BA; Ydenberg RC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):601-8. PubMed ID: 19864281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of prior residence and pair bond on scrounging choices in flocks of zebra finches, Taenopygia guttata.
    Beauchamp G
    Behav Processes; 2000 Dec; 52(2-3):131-140. PubMed ID: 11164681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the importance of accounting for alternative foraging tactics when assessing cognitive performance in wild animals.
    Vernouillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2474-2477. PubMed ID: 34734419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Costs and benefits of alternative food handling tactics help explain facultative exploitation of pollination mutualisms.
    Lichtenberg EM; Irwin RE; Bronstein JL
    Ecology; 2018 Aug; 99(8):1815-1824. PubMed ID: 29800495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Producers, scroungers and the price of a free meal.
    Ranta E; Peuhkuri N; Hirvonen H; Barnard CJ
    Anim Behav; 1998 Mar; 55(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 9514673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Producers and scroungers: feeding-type composition changes with group size in a socially foraging spider.
    Dumke M; Herberstein ME; Schneider JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27075253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Persistent producer-scrounger relationships in bats.
    Harten L; Matalon Y; Galli N; Navon H; Dor R; Yovel Y
    Sci Adv; 2018 Feb; 4(2):e1603293. PubMed ID: 29441356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evolutionary perspective on social inequality and health disparities: Insights from the producer-scrounger game.
    Wells JCK
    Evol Med Public Health; 2023; 11(1):294-308. PubMed ID: 37680454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Daily Patterns of Optimal Producer and Scrounger Use under Predation Hazard: A State-Dependent Dynamic Game Analysis.
    Barta Z; Giraldeau LA
    Am Nat; 2000 Apr; 155(4):570-582. PubMed ID: 10753082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A stab in the dark: chick killing by brood parasitic honeyguides.
    Spottiswoode CN; Koorevaar J
    Biol Lett; 2012 Apr; 8(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 21900311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.