127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37935434)
21. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Prognosis and Risk Stratification Based on Pelvic Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Li X; Wei LC; Zhang Y; Zhao LN; Li WW; Ping LJ; Dang YZ; Hu J; Shi M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1472-9. PubMed ID: 27400321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nomograms predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer.
Feng Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Wu S; Li Y; Li M
BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):450. PubMed ID: 33892663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Novel Risk Factor for Para-Aortic Lymph Node Recurrence After Definite Pelvic Radiotherapy in Stage IIIB Cervical Cancer.
Zhang G; Wang C; Ma C; Miao L; He F; Fu C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221141541. PubMed ID: 36426576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
Ma R; Zhang H; Zou L; Qu Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 25877610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PARa-aOrtic LymphAdenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer (PAROLA trial): a GINECO, ENGOT, and GCIG study.
Martinez A; Lecuru F; Bizzarri N; Chargari C; Ducassou A; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Cibula D; Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil Moreno A; Angeles MA; Muallem MZ; Kohler C; Luyckx M; Kridelka F; Rychlik A; Gerestein KG; Heinzelmann V; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Ferron G; Betrian S; Filleron T; Fotopoulou C; Querleu D;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Feb; 33(2):293-298. PubMed ID: 36717163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer?
Pedone Anchora L; Carbone V; Gallotta V; Fanfani F; Cosentino F; Turco LC; Fedele C; Bizzarri N; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Survival outcomes of 2018 FIGO stage IIIC versus stages IIIA and IIIB in cervical cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Wang C; Zhao Z; Cheng L; Xu S; Xie P; Xie L; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jun; 165(3):959-968. PubMed ID: 37950594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in patients with node-positive cervical squamous cell carcinoma following radical surgery.
Guo Q; Zhu J; Wu Y; Wen H; Xia L; Yu M; Wang S; Ju X; Wu X
J Cancer; 2020; 11(24):7339-7347. PubMed ID: 33193898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic factors in locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node metastasis.
Pinto PJJ; Chen MJ; Santos Neto E; Faloppa CC; De Brot L; Guimaraes APG; da Costa AABA; Baiocchi G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Mar; 32(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 35256409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.
Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M
Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for FIGO2018 Stage IIIC1 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Kagabu M; Nagasawa T; Tatsuki S; Fukagawa Y; Tomabechi H; Takatori E; Kaido Y; Shoji T; Baba T
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 May; 57(6):. PubMed ID: 34072478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis and Risk Factors in 975 Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IA-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Cao L; Kong W; Li J; Song D; Jin B; Liu T; Han C
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 36450266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Potential prognostic factors in progression-free survival for patients with cervical cancer.
Chen HH; Meng WY; Li RZ; Wang QY; Wang YW; Pan HD; Yan PY; Wu QB; Liu L; Yao XJ; Kang M; Leung EL
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):531. PubMed ID: 33971846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of
Isaji Y; Tsuyoshi H; Tsujikawa T; Orisaka M; Okazawa H; Yoshida Y
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):18864. PubMed ID: 37914892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
