145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37935995)
1. The prognostic role of next-generation imaging-driven upstaging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.
Bauckneht M; Checcucci E; Cisero E; Rizzo A; Racca M; De Cillis S; Amparore D; De Luca S; Fiori C; Rescigno P; Porpiglia F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Feb; 51(3):864-870. PubMed ID: 37935995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.
Donswijk ML; van Leeuwen PJ; Vegt E; Cheung Z; Heijmink SWTPJ; van der Poel HG; Stokkel MPM
BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):723. PubMed ID: 32758168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging.
Ma TM; Gafita A; Shabsovich D; Juarez J; Grogan TR; Thin P; Armstrong W; Sonni I; Nguyen K; Lok V; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Steinberg ML; Kupelian PA; Yang DD; Muralidhar V; Chu C; Feng F; Savjani R; Deng J; Parikh NR; Nickols NG; Elashoff D; Czernin J; Calais J; Kishan AU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):100-103. PubMed ID: 33602654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Is Associated with Improved Oncological Outcome in Men Treated with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Meijer D; Eppinga WSC; Mohede RM; Vanneste BGL; Meijnen P; Meijer OWM; Daniels LA; van den Bergh RCN; Lont AP; Ettema RH; Oudshoorn FHK; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Oprea-Lager DE; Schaake EE; Vis AN
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 35074282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Baseline PSMA-PET/CT as a predictor of PSA persistence following radical prostatectomy in high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.
Du X; Dong Y; Liu J; Su Y; Zhu Y; Pan J; Dong B; Chen R; Liu J; Tong Z; Pienta KJ; Rowe SP; Dong L; Xue W
Prostate; 2023 Aug; 83(11):1112-1120. PubMed ID: 37165552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.
Mattana F; Muraglia L; Rajwa P; Zattoni F; Marra G; Chiu PKF; Heidegger I; Kasivisvanathan V; Kesch CV; Olivier J; Preisser F; Thibault C; Valerio M; van den Bergh RCN; Gandaglia G; Ceci F;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 36804735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer.
Xiang M; Ma TM; Savjani R; Pollom EL; Karnes RJ; Grogan T; Wong JK; Motterle G; Tosoian JJ; Trock BJ; Klein EA; Stish BJ; Dess RT; Spratt DE; Pilar A; Reddy C; Levin-Epstein R; Wedde TB; Lilleby WA; Fiano R; Merrick GS; Stock RG; Demanes DJ; Moran BJ; Huland H; Tran PT; Martin S; Martinez-Monge R; Krauss DJ; Abu-Isa EI; Alam R; Schwen Z; Pisansky TM; Choo CR; Song DY; Greco S; Deville C; McNutt T; DeWeese TL; Ross AE; Ciezki JP; Boutros PC; Nickols NG; Bhat P; Shabsovich D; Juarez JE; Chong N; Kupelian PA; Rettig MB; Zaorsky NG; Berlin A; Tward JD; Davis BJ; Reiter RE; Steinberg ML; Elashoff D; Horwitz EM; Tendulkar RD; Tilki D; Czernin J; Gafita A; Romero T; Calais J; Kishan AU
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2138550. PubMed ID: 34902034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective, multicenter head-to-head comparative study in patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer investigating the bone lesion detection of conventional imaging and
Bodar YJL; Luining WI; Keizer B; Meijer D; Vellekoop A; Schaaf M; Hendrikse NH; Van Moorselaar RJA; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 41(4):205.e17-205.e24. PubMed ID: 36588019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Exterkate L; Hermsen R; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Prette JF; Baas DJH; Somford DM; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 37230883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after PSMA PET/CT-directed radiotherapy or surgery without systemic therapy.
Harsini S; Wilson D; Saprunoff H; Allan H; Gleave M; Goldenberg L; Chi KN; Kim-Sing C; Tyldesley S; Bénard F
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):27. PubMed ID: 36932416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of
Sonni I; Eiber M; Fendler WP; Alano RM; Vangala SS; Kishan AU; Nickols N; Rettig MB; Reiter RE; Czernin J; Calais J
J Nucl Med; 2020 Aug; 61(8):1153-1160. PubMed ID: 31924715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
