These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37936011)

  • 1. More powerful parameter tests? No, rather biased parameter estimates. Some reflections on path analysis with weighted composites.
    Schuberth F; Schamberger T; Henseler J
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):4205-4215. PubMed ID: 37936011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which method is more powerful in testing the relationship of theoretical constructs? A meta comparison of structural equation modeling and path analysis with weighted composites.
    Deng L; Yuan KH
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1460-1479. PubMed ID: 35653013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Premature conclusions about the signal-to-noise ratio in structural equation modeling research: A commentary on Yuan and Fang (2023).
    Schuberth F; Schamberger T; Rönkkö M; Liu Y; Henseler J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):682-694. PubMed ID: 37070527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which method delivers greater signal-to-noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
    Yuan KH; Fang Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):646-678. PubMed ID: 37786372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Estimating and Testing the Mediation Effect: Structural Equation Modeling versus Path Analysis with Weighted Composites.
    Yuan KH; Zhang Z; Wang L
    Psychometrika; 2024 Sep; 89(3):974-1006. PubMed ID: 38806853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling Methods From the Perspective of Regression Component Analysis.
    Rigdon EE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(4):677-692. PubMed ID: 38591183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A robust alternative estimator for small to moderate sample SEM: Bias-corrected factor score path analysis.
    Kelcey B
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():83-98. PubMed ID: 30501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global Least Squares Path Modeling: A Full-Information Alternative to Partial Least Squares Path Modeling.
    Hwang H; Cho G
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):947-972. PubMed ID: 33346884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distributionally weighted least squares in structural equation modeling.
    Du H; Bentler PM
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):519-540. PubMed ID: 34166048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in-depth discussion and illustration of partial least squares structural equation modeling in health care.
    Avkiran NK
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2018 Sep; 21(3):401-408. PubMed ID: 28181112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app.
    Jak S; Jorgensen TD; Verdam MGE; Oort FJ; Elffers L
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1385-1406. PubMed ID: 33140375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Out-of-bag Prediction Error: A Cross Validation Index for Generalized Structured Component Analysis.
    Cho G; Jung K; Hwang H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(4):505-513. PubMed ID: 30977677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Henseler-Ogasawara specification of composites in structural equation modeling: A tutorial.
    Schuberth F
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Aug; 28(4):843-859. PubMed ID: 34914475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Penalized Least Squares for Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Responses.
    Huang PH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):279-297. PubMed ID: 32990059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of Bayesian structural equation modeling in construction and demolition waste management studies: Development of an extended theory of planned behavior.
    Mohamed NA; Alanzi ARA; Azizan AN; Azizan SA; Samsudin N; Salarzadeh Jenatabadi H
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0290376. PubMed ID: 38261595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.
    Tu YK; Wu YC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 28709406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.