These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37936732)
1. An initial experience of using dual energy contrast enhanced mammography at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Zeeshan S; Shafqat G; Ali D; Vohra L Pak J Med Sci; 2023; 39(6):1869-1874. PubMed ID: 37936732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening. Coffey K; Jochelson MS Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of contrast-enhanced mammography in surgical management of breast cancers for women with dense breasts: a dual-center, multi-disciplinary study in Asia. Goh Y; Chou CP; Chan CW; Buhari SA; Hartman M; Tang SW; Ng CWQ; Pillay P; Chua W; Jagmohan P; Sterling E; Wong YM; Tan LY; Ong HY; Pan HB; Lee HS; Hung BH; Quek ST Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8226-8237. PubMed ID: 35788756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging. Taylor DB; Burrows S; Saunders CM; Parizel PM; Ives A Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Feb; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 36781808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced mammography in detecting malignant lesions in patients with extremely dense breasts compared to the all-densities population. Grażyńska A; Niewiadomska A; Owczarek AJ; Winder M; Hołda J; Zwolińska O; Barczyk-Gutkowska A; Modlińska S; Lorek A; Kuźbińska A; Steinhof-Radwańska K Pol J Radiol; 2024; 89():e240-e248. PubMed ID: 38938658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare. Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-Positive and False-Negative Contrast-enhanced Mammograms: Pitfalls and Strategies to Improve Cancer Detection. Carnahan MB; Harper L; Brown PJ; Bhatt AA; Eversman S; Sharpe RE; Patel BK Radiographics; 2023 Dec; 43(12):e230100. PubMed ID: 38032823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes. Alcantara R; Posso M; Pitarch M; Arenas N; Ejarque B; Iotti V; Besutti G Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):417-428. PubMed ID: 35895121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gelardi F; Ragaini EM; Sollini M; Bernardi D; Chiti A Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36010240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer]. Fischer U; Diekmann F; Helbich T; Preibsch H; Püsken M; Wenkel E; Wienbeck S; Fallenberg EM Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 63(12):916-924. PubMed ID: 37889284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art. Jochelson MS; Lobbes MBI Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 33650905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study. Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Conventional Imaging in Women with Dense Breasts. Moffa G; Galati F; Maroncelli R; Rizzo V; Cicciarelli F; Pasculli M; Pediconi F Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 37568883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions. Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts. Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]