These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37937031)
21. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs. Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optical coherence tomography as a non-invasive method of enamel thickness diagnosis after orthodontic treatment by 3 different types of brackets. Machoy ME; Koprowski R; Szyszka-Sommerfeld L; Safranow K; Gedrange T; Woźniak K Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Feb; 28(2):211-218. PubMed ID: 30048049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study. Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study. Lombardo L; Wierusz W; Toscano D; Lapenta R; Kaplan A; Siciliani G Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():37. PubMed ID: 24325847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Morphological investigation of various orthodontic lingual bracket slots using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Choi S; Kim JH; Kim NJ; Lee SH; Kim H; Kim KA; Park KH; Park YG Microsc Res Tech; 2016 Dec; 79(12):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 27862630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket. Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Wang WN; Li CH; Chou TH; Wang DD; Lin LH; Lin CT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 14718881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Determination of orthodontic bracket and tooth adaptation using an X-ray micro-computer tomography scanner. Fakir Y; Keanly C; Mulder R MethodsX; 2020; 7():100851. PubMed ID: 32280599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mechanical analysis of the improved superelastic Ni-Ti alloy wire using the orthodontic simulator with high-precision sensors. Mikami N; Yonemitsu I; Takemura H; Kondou M; Soga K; Suga K; Kanno Z; Lai W; Uo M; Ono T J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105861. PubMed ID: 37146519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The direct way of indirect bonding--the combined effect. Gayake PV; Chitko SS; Sutrave N; Gaikwad PM Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 24358650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preventing and treating white-spot lesions associated with orthodontic treatment: a survey of general dentists and orthodontists. Hamdan AM; Maxfield BJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Lindauer SJ J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Jul; 143(7):777-83. PubMed ID: 22751981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Blakey R; Mah J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20620836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding. Ma W; Preston B; Asai Y; Guan H; Guan G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 25439208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Speer C; Zimny D; Hopfenmueller W; Holtgrave EA Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 16279832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of changes in enamel thickness after orthodontic treatment depending on the force applied to remove orthodontic brackets: OCT analysis and universal testing machine. Machoy ME; Seeliger J; Szyszka-Sommerfeld L; Koprowski R; Gedrange T; Woźniak K Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Jun; 28(6):807-813. PubMed ID: 30888122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dental Hygiene and Orthodontics: Effect of Ultrasonic Instrumentation on Bonding Efficacy of Different Lingual Orthodontic Brackets. Scribante A; Sfondrini MF; Collesano V; Tovt G; Bernardinelli L; Gandini P Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3714651. PubMed ID: 28904955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study. Dragomirescu AO; Bencze MA; Vasilache A; Teodorescu E; Albu CC; Popoviciu NO; Ionescu E Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 35407973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]