196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37937032)
1. Online Patient Education Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Assessment of the Accuracy and Reliability of Information on the Internet Over the Past Decade.
Guzman AJ; Dela Rueda T; Williams N; Rayos Del Sol S; Jenkins S; Shin C; Bryant S; McGahan P; Chen Md Mph J
Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e46599. PubMed ID: 37937032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Source and Quality of Information on the Internet Between Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Australian Experience.
Devitt BM; Hartwig T; Klemm H; Cosic FT; Green J; Webster KE; Feller JA; Baker JF
Orthop J Sports Med; 2017 Dec; 5(12):2325967117741887. PubMed ID: 29242806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet.
Bruce-Brand RA; Baker JF; Byrne DP; Hogan NA; McCarthy T
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1095-100. PubMed ID: 23582738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online Resources for Rotator Cuff Repair: What are Patients Reading?
Goldenberg BT; Schairer WW; Dekker TJ; Lacheta L; Millett PJ
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 1(1):e85-e92. PubMed ID: 32266344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability and quality levels of websites that contain written information about anterior cruciate ligament injury: A survey of Turkish websites.
Şahin AA; Boz M; Keçeci T; Ünal A; Çıraklı A
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2022 Mar; 56(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 35416158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can patients and clinicians find conservative management protocols of anterior cruciate ligament injuries online? A systematic review.
Verhagen AP; Mehta P; Hildenbrand C; Pace J; Nasser A; McCambridge AB
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2023 Jun; 65():102754. PubMed ID: 37098282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the quality of information online for arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Shazil Jamal M; Hurley ET; Davey MS; Asad H; Gaafar M; Mullett H
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 May; 105(5):394-399. PubMed ID: 35639042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Venosa M; Cerciello S; Zoubi M; Petralia G; Vespasiani A; Angelozzi M; Romanini E; Logroscino G
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58618. PubMed ID: 38770469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.
Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR
World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery?
Gao B; Shamrock AG; Gulbrandsen TR; O'Reilly OC; Duchman KR; Westermann RW; Wolf BR
Orthop J Sports Med; 2022 Jul; 10(7):23259671221089977. PubMed ID: 35928178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
