BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37937765)

  • 1. Comparison of visual and semi-automated kilovoltage cone beam CT image QA analysis.
    Becerra-Espinosa N; Claps L; Alaei P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14190. PubMed ID: 37937765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical Note: Assessing the performance of monthly CBCT image quality QA.
    Manger RP; Pawlicki T; Hoisak J; Kim GY
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 30972767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A framework for automated and streamlined kV cone beam computed tomography image quality assurance: a multi-institutional study.
    Ayan AS; Kim G; Whitaker M; Al-Hallaq H; Hsu SH; Woollard J; Roberts DA; Shtraus N; Gao S; Gupta N; Moran JM
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Oct; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34544065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of a prototype rapid kilovoltage x-ray image guidance system designed for a ring shape radiation therapy unit.
    Cai B; Laugeman E; Mazur TR; Park JC; Henke LE; Kim H; Hugo GD; Mutic S; Li H
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1355-1370. PubMed ID: 30675902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the stability of image-quality parameters of Varian on-board imaging (OBI) and EPID imaging systems.
    Stanley DN; Papanikolaou N; Gutierrez AN
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5088. PubMed ID: 26103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy.
    Schreibmann E; Elder E; Fox T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 10(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 19223842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed dose and image quality of Varian TrueBeam CBCT compared with OBI CBCT.
    Kawahara D; Ozawa S; Nakashima T; Suzuki T; Tsuneda M; Tanaka S; Ohno Y; Murakami Y; Nagata Y
    Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1628-1633. PubMed ID: 27923551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An AI-based universal phantom analysis method based on XML-SVG wireframes with novel functional object identifiers.
    Sakaamini A; Van Slyke A; Partouche J; Wu T; Wiersma RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(14):. PubMed ID: 37267994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quality assurance program for image quality of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.
    Bissonnette JP; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1807-15. PubMed ID: 18561655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CBCT image quality QA: Establishing a quantitative program.
    Taneja S; Barbee DL; Rea AJ; Malin M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):215-225. PubMed ID: 33078562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term Inter-protocol kV CBCT image quality assessment for a ring-gantry linac via automated QA approach.
    Peng J; Li H; Laugeman E; Mazur T; Lam D; Li T; Sun B; Hu W; Dong L; Hugo GD; Mutic S; Cai B
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015025. PubMed ID: 33438613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
    Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols.
    Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography.
    Miura H; Ozawa S; Okazue T; Kawakubo A; Yamada K; Nagata Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29667294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Design and Implementation of Automated QA Software for Cone Beam CT Image].
    Wang T; Feng H; Li S; Yang Y
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 43(1):25-28. PubMed ID: 30770686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-year analysis of Elekta CBCT image quality using NPS and MTF.
    Nakahara S; Tachibana M; Watanabe Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):211-222. PubMed ID: 27167279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cone beam CT for QA of synthetic CT in MRI only for prostate patients.
    Palmér E; Persson E; Ambolt P; Gustafsson C; Gunnlaugsson A; Olsson LE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):44-52. PubMed ID: 30182461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the improvement of CBCT image quality for soft tissue-based SRS localization.
    Mao W; Gardner SJ; Snyder KC; Wen NW; Zhong H; Li H; Jackson P; Shah M; Chetty IJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):177-184. PubMed ID: 30294838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.