These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37938377)
21. Iontophoresis CXL With and Without Epithelial Debridement Versus Standard CXL: 2-Year Clinical Results of a Prospective Clinical Study. Vinciguerra P; Rosetta P; Legrottaglie EF; Morenghi E; Mazzotta C; Kaye SB; Vinciguerra R J Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 35(3):184-190. PubMed ID: 30855096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of contact lens-assisted and transepithelial corneal crosslinking with standard epithelium-off crosslinking for progressive keratoconus: 24-month clinical results. Malhotra C; Gupta B; Jain AK; Dhar S; Gupta A; Balyan M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Feb; 48(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 34174043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a irradiation for keratoconus: long-term results. Hashemi H; Seyedian MA; Miraftab M; Fotouhi A; Asgari S Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1515-20. PubMed ID: 23583165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Standard corneal collagen crosslinking versus transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted corneal crosslinking, 24 months follow-up: randomized control trial. Bikbova G; Bikbov M Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 94(7):e600-e606. PubMed ID: 27040458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized clinical trial comparing customized corneal crosslinking: epi-on in high oxygen and epi-off in room air for keratoconus. Elving S; Fredriksson A; Beckman Rehnman J; Behndig A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2024 Jul; 50(7):746-753. PubMed ID: 38465837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cm Ting DSJ; Rana-Rahman R; Chen Y; Bell D; Danjoux JP; Morgan SJ; Ghosh S; Baylis O Eye (Lond); 2019 May; 33(5):812-818. PubMed ID: 30610230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Visual and Tomographic Outcomes of Epithelium-On and Epithelium-Off Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking: A Longitudinal Study. Niyazmand H; McKelvie J; Li Y; McLintock C Cornea; 2021 May; 40(5):643-647. PubMed ID: 33079917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Iontophoretic collagen cross-linking versus epithelium-off collagen cross-linking for early stage of progressive keratoconus - 3 years follow-up study. Cantemir A; Alexa AI; Galan BG; Anton N; Ciuntu RE; Danielescu C; Chiselita D; Costin D Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):e649-e655. PubMed ID: 29110439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Standard Versus Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking for Keratoconus: 1-Year Outcomes From the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study. Kandel H; Nguyen V; Ferdi AC; Gupta A; Abbondanza M; Sullivan L; Apel A; Watson SL Cornea; 2021 Dec; 40(12):1581-1589. PubMed ID: 33935236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characteristics influencing outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and ectasia: implications for patient selection. Greenstein SA; Hersh PS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1133-40. PubMed ID: 23889865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accelerated Epi-On Versus Standard Epi-Off Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients: Five Years of Follow-Up. Henriquez MA; Hernandez-Sahagun G; Camargo J; Izquierdo L Cornea; 2020 Dec; 39(12):1493-1498. PubMed ID: 32796273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review. Ng SM; Hawkins BS; Kuo IC Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 229():274-287. PubMed ID: 34048801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Outcome of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Patients with Advanced Progressive Keratoconus: A 2-Year Follow-up Study. Moghadam RS; Akbari M; Alizadeh Y; Medghalchi A; Dalvandi R Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2019; 26(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 31114118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 36-Month Outcomes of Mechanical and Transepithelial PTK Epithelium Removal Techniques Prior to Accelerated CXL for Progressive Keratoconus. Ozdas D; Yesilirmak N; Sarac O; Cagil N J Refract Surg; 2022 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 35275008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prospective, randomized contralateral eye study of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus. Eissa SA; Yassin A Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):971-979. PubMed ID: 29564806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction model for treatment outcomes 3 years after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. Li Y; Qiao C; Wang H; Liu Y; Qi M; Ke L; Zhou Y; Shen D; Zeng Q Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; 44(1):382. PubMed ID: 39302502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative evaluation of progression rate in keratoconus before and after collagen crosslinking. Wang YM; Chan TC; Yu MCY; Jhanji V Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 102(8):1109-1113. PubMed ID: 29122823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Epithelium-Off vs. transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus: 3 years of follow-up. Arance-Gil Á; Villa-Collar C; Pérez-Sanchez B; Carracedo G; Gutiérrez-Ortega R J Optom; 2021; 14(2):189-198. PubMed ID: 32883647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Conventional and Iontophoresis Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Efficacy and Assessment by Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Microscopy. Jouve L; Borderie V; Sandali O; Temstet C; Basli E; Laroche L; Bouheraoua N Cornea; 2017 Feb; 36(2):153-162. PubMed ID: 28060061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]