These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37938978)

  • 41. Enhancing geometric representations for molecules with equivariant vector-scalar interactive message passing.
    Wang Y; Wang T; Li S; He X; Li M; Wang Z; Zheng N; Shao B; Liu TY
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):313. PubMed ID: 38182565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN-based Multi-body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI-score) Based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Khashan R; Tropsha A; Zheng W
    Mol Inform; 2022 Aug; 41(8):e2100248. PubMed ID: 35142086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. D3CARP: a comprehensive platform with multiple-conformation based docking, ligand similarity search and deep learning approaches for target prediction and virtual screening.
    Shi Y; Zhang X; Yang Y; Cai T; Peng C; Wu L; Zhou L; Han J; Ma M; Zhu W; Xu Z
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 164():107283. PubMed ID: 37536095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction.
    Li H; Leung KS; Wong MH; Ballester PJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(Suppl 11):308. PubMed ID: 28185549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
    Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 31463704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting Drug-Target Interaction Using a Novel Graph Neural Network with 3D Structure-Embedded Graph Representation.
    Lim J; Ryu S; Park K; Choe YJ; Ham J; Kim WY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3981-3988. PubMed ID: 31443612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pre- and post-docking sampling of conformational changes using ClustENM and HADDOCK for protein-protein and protein-DNA systems.
    Kurkcuoglu Z; Bonvin AMJJ
    Proteins; 2020 Feb; 88(2):292-306. PubMed ID: 31441121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. DLSSAffinity: protein-ligand binding affinity prediction
    Wang H; Liu H; Ning S; Zeng C; Zhao Y
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 May; 24(17):10124-10133. PubMed ID: 35416807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):689-699. PubMed ID: 28668990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges.
    Huang SY
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):982-994. PubMed ID: 28334282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. AGL-Score: Algebraic Graph Learning Score for Protein-Ligand Binding Scoring, Ranking, Docking, and Screening.
    Nguyen DD; Wei GW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jul; 59(7):3291-3304. PubMed ID: 31257871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3.
    Abramson J; Adler J; Dunger J; Evans R; Green T; Pritzel A; Ronneberger O; Willmore L; Ballard AJ; Bambrick J; Bodenstein SW; Evans DA; Hung CC; O'Neill M; Reiman D; Tunyasuvunakool K; Wu Z; Žemgulytė A; Arvaniti E; Beattie C; Bertolli O; Bridgland A; Cherepanov A; Congreve M; Cowen-Rivers AI; Cowie A; Figurnov M; Fuchs FB; Gladman H; Jain R; Khan YA; Low CMR; Perlin K; Potapenko A; Savy P; Singh S; Stecula A; Thillaisundaram A; Tong C; Yakneen S; Zhong ED; Zielinski M; Žídek A; Bapst V; Kohli P; Jaderberg M; Hassabis D; Jumper JM
    Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):493-500. PubMed ID: 38718835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. DENVIS: Scalable and High-Throughput Virtual Screening Using Graph Neural Networks with Atomic and Surface Protein Pocket Features.
    Krasoulis A; Antonopoulos N; Pitsikalis V; Theodorakis S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Oct; 62(19):4642-4659. PubMed ID: 36154119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
    Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating native-like structures of RNA-protein complexes through the deep learning method.
    Zeng C; Jian Y; Vosoughi S; Zeng C; Zhao Y
    Nat Commun; 2023 Feb; 14(1):1060. PubMed ID: 36828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.