These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37939327)

  • 1. Incarceration Status Among Individuals Obtaining Abortion in the United States, 2020.
    Kirstein M; Fuentes L; Sufrin C
    Am J Public Health; 2023 Dec; 113(12):1352-1355. PubMed ID: 37939327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion Access for Incarcerated People: Incidence of Abortion and Policies at U.S. Prisons and Jails.
    Sufrin C; Jones RK; Beal L; Mosher WD; Bell S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 138(3):330-337. PubMed ID: 34352850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-
    Madden N; Trawick E; Watson K; Yee LM
    Am J Public Health; 2024 Oct; 114(10):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 39231409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal Impact of
    Smith MH; McGowan ML; Kerestes C; Bessett D; Norris AH
    Am J Public Health; 2024 Oct; 114(10):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 39231404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
    Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does distance decrease healthcare options for pregnant, incarcerated people? Mapping the distance between abortion providers and prisons.
    Gips J; Psoter KJ; Sufrin C
    Contraception; 2020 Apr; 101(4):266-272. PubMed ID: 31982415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Role of Telehealth in Promoting Equitable Abortion Access in the United States: Spatial Analysis.
    Koenig LR; Becker A; Ko J; Upadhyay UD
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2023 Nov; 9():e45671. PubMed ID: 37934583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.
    Riley T; Fiastro AE; Benson LS; Khattar A; Prager S; Godfrey EM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 May; 7(5):e2413847. PubMed ID: 38809551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
    JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-country abortion travel to England and Wales: results from a cross-sectional survey exploring people's experiences crossing borders to obtain care.
    Garnsey C; Zanini G; De Zordo S; Mishtal J; Wollum A; Gerdts C
    Reprod Health; 2021 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 34022888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion-Related Laws and Concurrent Patterns in Abortion Incidence in Indiana, 2010-2019.
    Moseson H; Smith MH; Chakraborty P; Gyuras HJ; Foster A; Bessett D; Wilkinson TA; Norris AH
    Am J Public Health; 2023 Apr; 113(4):429-437. PubMed ID: 36795983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of new abortion restrictions on people in prison: Estimated number of incarcerated people without abortion access and distance to abortion providers.
    Bell SO; Dozier JL; Casubhoy I; Sufrin C
    Contraception; 2024 Jan; 129():110278. PubMed ID: 37673362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women's Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study.
    Baum SE; White K; Hopkins K; Potter JE; Grossman D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165048. PubMed ID: 27783708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors hindering access to abortion services.
    Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):54-9, 87. PubMed ID: 7796896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Providing controversial health care: abortion services since 1973.
    Forrest JD; Henshaw SK
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 8274870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia.
    Doran FM; Hornibrook J
    Rural Remote Health; 2016; 16(1):3538. PubMed ID: 26987999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of abortion bans on short-term housing needs.
    Sehgal NKR; Hswen Y; Cantor J; Upadhyay UD; Reis BY; Remmel C; Brownstein JS; Rader B
    Public Health; 2024 Mar; 228():200-205. PubMed ID: 38412759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of abortion patients in the United States, 1979 and 1980.
    Henshaw SK; O'Reilly K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(1):5-8, 10-6. PubMed ID: 6394357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unequal Spatial Consequences of Abortion Restrictions in Texas, 2021-2023.
    Sauter SR; Wallace ME; Hernandez JH
    Am J Public Health; 2024 Oct; 114(10):1024-1033. PubMed ID: 38781540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.