110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37939480)
1. Plan robustness and RBE influence for proton dose painting by numbers for head and neck cancers.
Almhagen E; Dasu A; Johansson S; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
Phys Med; 2023 Nov; 115():103157. PubMed ID: 37939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation dose-painting with protons vs. photons for head-and-neck cancer.
Håkansson K; Smulders B; Specht L; Zhu M; Friborg J; Rasmussen JH; Bentzen SM; Vogelius IR
Acta Oncol; 2020 May; 59(5):525-533. PubMed ID: 31964199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust maximization of tumor control probability for radicality constrained radiotherapy dose painting by numbers of head and neck cancer.
Grönlund E; Almhagen E; Johansson S; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 12():56-62. PubMed ID: 33458296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust dose-painting-by-numbers vs. nonselective dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Petit SF; Breedveld S; Unkelbach J; den Hertog D; Balvert M
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3096-3108. PubMed ID: 33721350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dirty and clean dose concept: Towards creating proton therapy treatment plans with a photon-like dose response.
Heuchel L; Hahn C; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):622-636. PubMed ID: 37877574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust treatment planning of dose painting for prostate cancer based on ADC-to-Gleason score mappings - what is the potential to increase the tumor control probability?
Grönlund E; Almhagen E; Johansson S; Traneus E; Nyholm T; Thellenberg C; Ahnesjö A
Acta Oncol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 32941092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined RBE and OER optimization in proton therapy with FLUKA based on EF5-PET.
Henjum H; Dahle TJ; Mairani A; Pilskog S; Stokkevåg C; Boer CG; Redalen KR; Minn H; Malinen E; Ytre-Hauge KS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 24(9):e14014. PubMed ID: 37161820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of hypoxia dose painting by numbers based on EF5-PET in head and neck cancer.
Wright P; Arnesen MR; Lønne PI; Suilamo S; Silvoniemi A; Dale E; Minn H; Malinen E
Acta Oncol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 34184605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity modulated radiation therapy dose painting for localized prostate cancer using ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography scans.
Chang JH; Lim Joon D; Lee ST; Gong SJ; Anderson NJ; Scott AM; Davis ID; Clouston D; Bolton D; Hamilton CS; Khoo V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):e691-6. PubMed ID: 22658218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of deformable image coregistration in adaptive dose painting by numbers for head-and-neck cancer.
Olteanu LA; Madani I; De Neve W; Vercauteren T; De Gersem W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):696-703. PubMed ID: 22153223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hypoxia dose painting by numbers: a planning study.
Thorwarth D; Eschmann SM; Paulsen F; Alber M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 May; 68(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 17448882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated Robust Proton Planning Using Dose-Volume Histogram-Based Mimicking of the Photon Reference Dose and Reducing Organ at Risk Dose Optimization.
Kierkels RGJ; Fredriksson A; Both S; Langendijk JA; Scandurra D; Korevaar EW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jan; 103(1):251-258. PubMed ID: 30145392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinically Applicable Monte Carlo-based Biological Dose Optimization for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers With Spot-Scanning Proton Therapy.
Wan Chan Tseung HS; Ma J; Kreofsky CR; Ma DJ; Beltran C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Aug; 95(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 27325476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose painting by numbers in a standard treatment planning system using inverted dose prescription maps.
Arnesen MR; Knudtsen IS; Rekstad BL; Eilertsen K; Dale E; Bruheim K; Helland Å; Løndalen AM; Hellebust TP; Malinen E
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1607-13. PubMed ID: 26213311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive dose painting by numbers for head-and-neck cancer.
Duprez F; De Neve W; De Gersem W; Coghe M; Madani I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jul; 80(4):1045-55. PubMed ID: 20643512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
