128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37939489)
1. Applied machine learning for stroke differentiation by electrical impedance tomography with realistic numerical models.
Culpepper J; Lee H; Santorelli A; Porter E
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 37939489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-frequency symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography with machine learning for human stroke diagnosis.
McDermott B; Elahi A; Santorelli A; O'Halloran M; Avery J; Porter E
Physiol Meas; 2020 Aug; 41(7):075010. PubMed ID: 32554876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bi-frequency symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography-a novel technique for perturbation detection in static scenes.
McDermott B; Avery J; O'Halloran M; Aristovich K; Porter E
Physiol Meas; 2019 Apr; 40(4):044005. PubMed ID: 30786267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing machine learning algorithms for non-invasive detection and classification of failure in piezoresistive bone cement via electrical impedance tomography.
Keiderling L; Rosendorf J; Owens CE; Varadarajan KM; Hart AJ; Schwab J; Tallman TN; Ghaednia H
Rev Sci Instrum; 2023 Dec; 94(12):. PubMed ID: 38100565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bi-Frequency Symmetry Difference EIT-Feasibility and Limitations of Application to Stroke Diagnosis.
McDermott B; O'Halloran M; Avery J; Porter E
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2407-2419. PubMed ID: 31869810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of electrode arrangements for brain stroke diagnosis via electrical impedance tomography through numerical computational models.
Lee H; Culpepper J; Porter E
Physiol Meas; 2024 Feb; 45(2):. PubMed ID: 38306666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution conductivity reconstruction by electrical impedance tomography using structure-aware hybrid-fusion learning.
Yu H; Liu H; Liu Z; Wang Z; Jia J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jan; 243():107861. PubMed ID: 37931580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brain haemorrhage detection using a SVM classifier with electrical impedance tomography measurement frames.
McDermott B; O'Halloran M; Porter E; Santorelli A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200469. PubMed ID: 30001401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of Electrical Impedance Tomography Data Using Machine Learning.
Pessoa D; Rocha BM; Cheimariotis GA; Haris K; Strodthoff C; Kaimakamis E; Maglaveras N; Frerichs I; de Carvalho P; Paiva RP
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():349-353. PubMed ID: 34891307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image-based classification of bladder state using electrical impedance tomography.
Dunne E; Santorelli A; McGinley B; Leader G; O'Halloran M; Porter E
Physiol Meas; 2018 Dec; 39(12):124001. PubMed ID: 30507554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity Analysis Highlights the Importance of Accurate Head Models for Electrical Impedance Tomography Monitoring of Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Stroke.
Paldanius A; Dekdouk B; Toivanen J; Kolehmainen V; Hyttinen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1491-1501. PubMed ID: 34665718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advances in electrical impedance tomography-based brain imaging.
Ke XY; Hou W; Huang Q; Hou X; Bao XY; Kong WX; Li CX; Qiu YQ; Hu SY; Dong LH
Mil Med Res; 2022 Feb; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 35227324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Local Electrodes on Brain Stroke Type Differentiation using Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Lee H; Culpepper J; Farshkaran A; McDermott B; Porter E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():1412-1415. PubMed ID: 34891549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo bioimpedance changes during haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke in rats: towards 3D stroke imaging using electrical impedance tomography.
Dowrick T; Blochet C; Holder D
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):765-84. PubMed ID: 27200510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Realistic forward and inverse model mesh generation for rapid three-dimensional thoracic electrical impedance imaging.
Zifan A; Liatsis P; Almarzouqi H
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Apr; 107():97-108. PubMed ID: 30798220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Capacitively Coupled Electrical Impedance Tomography for Brain Imaging.
Jiang YD; Soleimani M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2104-2113. PubMed ID: 30703015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A noise-controlling method by hybrid current-stimulation and voltage-measurement for electrical impedance tomography (HCSVM-EIT).
Gao Z; Darma PN; Sun B; Kawashima D; Takei M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Sep; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37659392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
