BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37939684)

  • 1. Removal of α1-Microglobulin Using Post-Dilution Online Hemodiafiltration with Polymethylmethacrylate Membrane: An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study.
    Yoshida S; Yamamoto S; Miyauchi D; Terashima R; Hashimoto A; Miyazawa H; Tanaka T; Ishizawa M; Tanaka M; Tomita Y; Aoike I; Goto S; Narita I
    Blood Purif; 2024; 53(2):123-129. PubMed ID: 37939684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-permeability alternatives to current dialyzers performing both high-flux hemodialysis and postdilution online hemodiafiltration.
    Maduell F; Rodas L; Broseta JJ; Gómez M; Xipell Font M; Molina A; Montagud-Marrahi E; Guillén E; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera Rivera M; Rico N
    Artif Organs; 2019 Oct; 43(10):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 31038748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dialysis membrane-dependent removal of middle molecules during hemodiafiltration: the beta2-microglobulin/albumin relationship.
    Ahrenholz PG; Winkler RE; Michelsen A; Lang DA; Bowry SK
    Clin Nephrol; 2004 Jul; 62(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 15267009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short-daily online hemodiafiltration.
    Melo NC; Moyses RM; Elias RM; Castro MC
    Hemodial Int; 2014 Apr; 18(2):473-80. PubMed ID: 24393428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and comparison of polysulfone TS-UL and PMMA NF-U dialyzers versus expanded hemodialysis and postdilution hemodiafiltration.
    Maduell F; Broseta JJ; Rodríguez-Espinosa D; Hermida-Lama E; Rodas LM; Gómez M; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Rico N
    Artif Organs; 2021 Sep; 45(9):E317-E323. PubMed ID: 33908062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance evaluation of developed polysulfone membrane hemodiafilters, ABH-F and ABH-P, in post- and pre-dilution hemodiafiltration.
    Sakiyama R; Yamamoto K; Ishimori I; Yoshida S; Akiba T; Mineshima M
    J Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 18(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 26058830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of low-volume post-dilution online hemodiafiltration with Japanese high-performance hemodiafilters.
    Sakurai K; Hosoya H; Kurihara Y; Yamauchi F; Suzuki A; Kurosawa K; Saito T
    J Artif Organs; 2020 Sep; 23(3):234-239. PubMed ID: 32266500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodiafiltration--a new treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients.
    Zehnder C; Gutzwiller JP; Renggli K
    Clin Nephrol; 1999 Sep; 52(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 10499310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins.
    Belmouaz M; Goussard G; Joly F; Sibille A; Martin C; Betous T; Thierry A; Bauwens M; Bridoux F
    Blood Purif; 2023; 52(3):309-318. PubMed ID: 36215951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score.
    Maduell F; Rodas L; Broseta JJ; Gomez M; Xipell M; Guillen E; Montagud-Marrahi E; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Rico N
    Blood Purif; 2019; 48(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 30943486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Middle molecules removal. Beyond beta2-microglobulin].
    Maduell F; Sánchez-Canel JJ; Blasco JA; Navarro V; Ríus A; Torregrosa E; Pin MT; Cruz C; Ferrero JA
    Nefrologia; 2006; 26(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 17058859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the effects of pre-dilution and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration on the levels of inflammatory markers, lymphocytes, and platelets.
    Kurihara Y; Hosoya H; Kishihara R; Yoshinaga M; Iwadate Y; Yamauchi F; Saito T; Sakurai K
    J Artif Organs; 2022 Mar; 25(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 34128110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-line haemodiafiltration. Remarkable removal of beta2-microglobulin. Long-term clinical observations.
    Lornoy W; Becaus I; Billiouw JM; Sierens L; Van Malderen P; D'Haenens P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000; 15 Suppl 1():49-54. PubMed ID: 10737167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Clinical Significance of Intermittent Infusion Hemodiafiltration Using Backfiltration of Ultrapure Dialysis Fluid Compared to Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
    Mineshima M; Takahashi S; Tomo T; Kawanishi H; Kawaguchi H; Minakuchi J; Nakanishi T; Sato T; Nitta K; Tsuchiya K; Masakane I; Itami N
    Blood Purif; 2019; 48(4):368-381. PubMed ID: 31311018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On-line haemodiafiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis. A prospective randomized study.
    Wizemann V; Lotz C; Techert F; Uthoff S
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000; 15 Suppl 1():43-8. PubMed ID: 10737166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis.
    Maduell F; Navarro V; Cruz MC; Torregrosa E; Garcia D; Simon V; Ferrero JA
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Sep; 40(3):582-9. PubMed ID: 12200811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new generation of cellulose triacetate suitable for online haemodiafiltration.
    Maduell F; Ojeda R; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Rodas L; Gómez M; Huablocho KP; Esquivel F; Mori PD; Hoffmann V; Ugalde J; Rico N
    Nefrologia (Engl Ed); 2018; 38(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 29198593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elimination of large uremic toxins by a dialyzer specifically designed for high-volume convective therapies.
    Maduell F; Arias-Guillen M; Fontseré N; Ojeda R; Rico N; Vera M; Elena M; Bedini JL; Wieneke P; Campistol JM
    Blood Purif; 2014; 37(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 24662288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cystatin C, beta2-microglobulin and C-reactive protein in hemodiafiltration and on-line endogenous liquid reinfusion and in low flux polysulphone bicarbonate conventional hemodialysis].
    Cristofano C; Vernaglione L; Perniola MA; Lo Barco C; Muscogiuri P; Chimienti S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S197-200. PubMed ID: 15750984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Solute Removal Properties Between High-Efficient Dialysis Modalities in Low Blood Flow Rate.
    Maduell F; Broseta JJ; Rodas L; Montagud-Marrahi E; Rodriguez-Espinosa D; Hermida E; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Gómez M; González B; Rico N
    Ther Apher Dial; 2020 Aug; 24(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31583845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.