259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37939943)
1. Use of passive sampling in environmental DNA metabarcoding technology: Monitoring of fish diversity in the Jiangmen coastal waters.
Zhang L; Zhou W; Jiao M; Xie T; Xie M; Li H; Suo A; Yue W; Ding D; He W
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 908():168298. PubMed ID: 37939943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Passive eDNA sampling facilitates biodiversity monitoring and rare species detection.
Chen X; Li S; Zhao J; Yao M
Environ Int; 2024 May; 187():108706. PubMed ID: 38696978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring.
Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis.
Bessey C; Neil Jarman S; Simpson T; Miller H; Stewart T; Kenneth Keesing J; Berry O
Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):236. PubMed ID: 33619330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of materials for rapid passive collection of environmental DNA.
Bessey C; Gao Y; Truong YB; Miller H; Jarman SN; Berry O
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2559-2572. PubMed ID: 35570323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS
Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A large scale temporal and spatial environmental DNA biodiversity survey of marine vertebrates in Brazil following the Fundão tailings dam failure.
Lines R; Juggernauth M; Peverley G; Keating J; Simpson T; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Bunce M; Berry TE; Taysom A; Bernardino AF; Whittle P
Mar Environ Res; 2023 Nov; 192():106239. PubMed ID: 37926039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Common Materials as Passive Samplers of Environmental DNA.
Chen X; Kong Y; Zhang S; Zhao J; Li S; Yao M
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(15):10798-10807. PubMed ID: 35856738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fish eDNA metabarcoding from aquatic biofilm samples: Methodological aspects.
Rivera SF; Rimet F; Vasselon V; Vautier M; Domaizon I; Bouchez A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 May; 22(4):1440-1453. PubMed ID: 34863036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring of multiple fish species by quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys over two summer seasons.
Wu L; Osugi T; Inagawa T; Okitsu J; Sakamoto S; Minamoto T
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13875. PubMed ID: 37830396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reflects spatiotemporal fish community shifts in the Scheldt estuary.
Van Driessche C; Everts T; Neyrinck S; Halfmaerten D; Verschelde P; Breine J; Bonte D; Brys R
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 934():173242. PubMed ID: 38763188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.
Pont D; Meulenbroek P; Bammer V; Dejean T; Erős T; Jean P; Lenhardt M; Nagel C; Pekarik L; Schabuss M; Stoeckle BC; Stoica E; Zornig H; Weigand A; Valentini A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 36151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
Miya M
Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas.
Gold Z; Sprague J; Kushner DJ; Zerecero Marin E; Barber PH
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0238557. PubMed ID: 33626067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea.
Yamamoto S; Masuda R; Sato Y; Sado T; Araki H; Kondoh M; Minamoto T; Miya M
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40368. PubMed ID: 28079122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
