These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37940170)

  • 1. Optimizing Contrast Resolution in Digital Chest Radiography by Varying Copper Filtration and kVp.
    Balac V; Grossman R; Griswold R; Bowman D
    Radiol Technol; 2023 Nov; 95(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 37940170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system.
    E A; A Y; T O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
    Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
    Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Copper Filtration and kVp: Effect on Entrance Skin Exposure.
    Barba J; Culp M
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 26199432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
    Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
    Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
    Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
    Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
    Behrman RH
    Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose optimization in cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; McMillan C; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091911. PubMed ID: 24007162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.