218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37940684)
1. A single-center, multi-factor, retrospective study to improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary prostate cancer using [
Lv J; Yu H; Yin H; Shi Y; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Feb; 51(3):919-927. PubMed ID: 37940684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the Gleason score be predicted in patients with prostate cancer? A dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,
Akkaya H; Dilek O; Özdemir S; Taş ZA; Öztürk İS; Gülek B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 Sep; 29(5):647-655. PubMed ID: 37395389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Evaluation of
Lopci E; Lughezzani G; Castello A; Saita A; Colombo P; Hurle R; Peschechera R; Benetti A; Zandegiacomo S; Pasini L; Casale P; Pietro D; Bevilacqua G; Balzarini L; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):764-771. PubMed ID: 32312701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in initial staging of patients with prostate cancer and importance of intraprostatic SUVmax values.
Rogic I; Golubic AT; Zuvic M; Smitran T; Jukic N; Gamulin M; Kastelan Z; Huic D
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2024; 27(0):6-12. PubMed ID: 38680016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-head comparisons of [
Ke ZB; Chen SM; Chen JY; Chen SH; You Q; Sun JB; Xue YT; Sun XL; Wu XH; Zheng QS; Wei Y; Xue XY; Xu N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1240-1251. PubMed ID: 36416906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [
Xie Y; Li C; Zhang L; Zang S; Yu F; Wang S; Wang F
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 42(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 36073212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined Utility of
Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Konety B; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 33741337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardised uptake values as determined on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.
Bodar YJL; Veerman H; Meijer D; de Bie K; van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk ML; van Moorselaar RJA; Hendrikse NH; Boellaard R; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
BJU Int; 2022 Jun; 129(6):768-776. PubMed ID: 35166426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations of
Topuz ÖV; Aksu A; Erinç SR; Tamam MÖ
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33866340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Satapathy S; Singh H; Kumar R; Mittal BR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 32755196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a nonnegligible effect of maximum standardized uptake value in the staging and management of prostate cancer with 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography imaging? A single-center experience.
Ekmekcioglu O; Yavuzsan AH; Arican P; Kirecci SL
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(6):1351-1357. PubMed ID: 34916365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Pepe P; Pepe L; Tamburo M; Marletta G; Savoca F; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
In Vivo; 2023; 37(3):1318-1322. PubMed ID: 37103095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Findings in 1,123 Men with Preoperative
Raveenthiran S; Yaxley WJ; Franklin T; Coughlin G; Roberts M; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Wong D; McEwan L; Brown N; Parkinson R; Esler R; Yaxley JW
J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):573-580. PubMed ID: 34694140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Xue AL; Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Levy SM; Sivaratnam D; Ryan A; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Moon D; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 34546815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the value of
Luo L; Zheng A; Chang R; Li Y; Gao J; Wang Z; Duan X
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):108. PubMed ID: 37924154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
