BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37941089)

  • 1. Single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm long implants with sinus floor augmentation or by 6-mm long implants: A 10-year randomized controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Gareb B; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 37941089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):315-326. PubMed ID: 31535100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 25237669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study.
    Perelli M; Abundo R; Corrente G; Saccone C
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 23000710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year data.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CHF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Dec; 45(12):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 30341961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three-year results of a randomized clinical study.
    Taschieri S; Lolato A; Testori T; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 29193558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Tutak M; Pohl V; Hämmerle CHF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2024 Apr; 51(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 38296249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Follow-up study of implants with turned or oxidized surfaces placed after sinus augmentation.
    Jungner M; Legrell PE; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1380-7. PubMed ID: 25397801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading.
    Schincaglia GP; Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1042-51. PubMed ID: 26425812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Jacotti M; Grandi G; Tuco L; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 26669545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twelve-Year Retrospective Follow-Up of Machined Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Radiographic and Peri-Implant Outcome.
    Simion M; Gionso L; Grossi GB; Briguglio F; Fontana F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e343-51. PubMed ID: 24909448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Pohl V; Thoma DS; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia-Garcia A; Taylor TD; Haas R; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 44(4):438-445. PubMed ID: 28081288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.
    Yu H; Wang X; Qiu L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 27436543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical, radiographic and economic evaluation of short-6-mm implants and longer implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in moderately atrophic maxillae: A 3-year randomized clinical trial.
    Shi JY; Lai YR; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Tonetti MS; Lai HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2021 May; 48(5):695-704. PubMed ID: 33570787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Pieri F; Caselli E; Forlivesi C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 27632276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sinus augmentation grafting with anorganic bovine bone versus 50% autologous bone mixed with 50% anorganic bovine bone: 5 years after loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Meloni SM; Lumbau A; Spano G; Baldoni E; Pisano M; Tullio A; Tallarico M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(4):483-492. PubMed ID: 31781701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants in atrophic maxillae: One-year post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Sammartino G; Grandi G; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 26355170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Terminal Posterior Tilted Implants Planned as a Sinus Graft Alternative for Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Maxillary Restoration: A Case Series with 10- to 19-Year Results on 44 Consecutive Patients Presenting for Routine Maintenance.
    Fortin Y; Sullivan RM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 27329930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.