These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37941253)
1. An Experimental Setup to Test Obstacle-Dealing Capabilities of Prosthetic Feet. Pace A; Proksch L; Grioli G; Aszmann OC; Bicchi A; Catalano MG IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes. Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts. Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking. Lamers EP; Eveld ME; Zelik KE J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109273. PubMed ID: 31431348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional joint center of prosthetic feet during level ground and incline walking. Lecomte C; Starker F; Guðnadóttir EÞ; Rafnsdóttir S; Guðmundsson K; Briem K; Brynjolfsson S Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jul; 81():13-21. PubMed ID: 32527519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait. van der Linden ML; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Li N; Paul JP J Biomech; 1999 Sep; 32(9):877-89. PubMed ID: 10460124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: a randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing. Raschke SU; Orendurff MS; Mattie JL; Kenyon DE; Jones OY; Moe D; Winder L; Wong AS; Moreno-Hernández A; Highsmith MJ; J Sanderson D; Kobayashi T J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 25480541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using a Simple Walking Model to Optimize Transfemoral Prostheses for Prosthetic Limb Stability-A Preliminary Study. Pace A; Howard D; Gard SA; Major MJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Dec; 28(12):3005-3012. PubMed ID: 33275584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees. A comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet. Colborne GR; Naumann S; Longmuir PE; Berbrayer D Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Oct; 71(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 1388973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emulating the Effective Ankle Stiffness of Commercial Prosthetic Feet Using a Robotic Prosthetic Foot Emulator. Halsne EG; Curran CS; Caputo JM; Hansen AH; Hafner BJ; Morgenroth DC J Biomech Eng; 2022 Nov; 144(11):. PubMed ID: 35722979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding adaptive gait in lower-limb amputees: insights from multivariate analyses. Buckley JG; De Asha AR; Johnson L; Beggs CB J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 10():98. PubMed ID: 23958032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot. Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of prosthetic ankle stiffness on ankle and knee kinematics, prosthetic limb loading, and net metabolic cost of trans-tibial amputee gait. Major MJ; Twiste M; Kenney LP; Howard D Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 24238976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prosthetic gait of unilateral lower-limb amputees with current and novel prostheses: A pilot study. De Pauw K; Serrien B; Baeyens JP; Cherelle P; De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Bailey SP; Lefeber D; Roelands B; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():59-67. PubMed ID: 31704536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants. De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Roelands B; Lefeber D; Meeusen R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum toe clearance and tripping probability in people with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on ramps with different prosthetic designs. Riveras M; Ravera E; Ewins D; Shaheen AF; Catalfamo-Formento P Gait Posture; 2020 Sep; 81():41-48. PubMed ID: 32663775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees. Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? Hafner BJ; Sanders JE; Czerniecki J; Fergason J Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jun; 17(5):325-44. PubMed ID: 12084537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterizing adaptations of prosthetic feet in the frontal plane. Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Aug; 44(4):225-233. PubMed ID: 32493118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]