These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37941288)
1. The Dynamic Adoption Journey: A Typology for Users and Non-Users of Occupational Exoskeletons. Elprama SA; De Bock S; Meeusen R; De Pauw K; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies. Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons. Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of exoskeletons in the occupational context for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal complaints. Steinhilber B; Luger T; Schwenkreis P; Middeldorf S; Bork H; Mann B; von Glinski A; Schildhauer TA; Weiler S; Schmauder M; Heinrich K; Winter G; Schnalke G; Frener P; Schick R; Wischniewski S; Jäger M IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(3):132-144. PubMed ID: 33140996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry. Okunola A; Afolabi A; Akanmu A; Jebelli H; Simikins S J Safety Res; 2024 Sep; 90():402-415. PubMed ID: 39251296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons. Golabchi A; Riahi N; Fix M; Miller L; Rouhani H; Tavakoli M Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104103. PubMed ID: 37499526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality, productivity, and economic implications of exoskeletons for occupational use: A systematic review. Fournier DE; Yung M; Somasundram KG; Du BB; Rezvani S; Yazdani A PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287742. PubMed ID: 37368889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room. Cha JS; Monfared S; Stefanidis D; Nussbaum MA; Yu D Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):377-390. PubMed ID: 31593495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research. Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting. Zhou X; Zheng L IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lower-Limb Exoskeletons Appeal to Both Clinicians and Older Adults, Especially for Fall Prevention and Joint Pain Reduction. Raitor M; Ruggles SW; Delp SL; Liu CK; Collins SH IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2024; 32():1577-1585. PubMed ID: 38536680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures. Golabchi A; Chao A; Tavakoli M Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can humans perceive the metabolic benefit provided by augmentative exoskeletons? Medrano RL; Thomas GC; Rouse EJ J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Feb; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 35219335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review. Zheng L; Lowe B; Hawke AL; Wu JZ Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2021; 49(4):1-13. PubMed ID: 35695600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of using a whole-body powered exoskeleton during simulated occupational load-handling tasks: A pilot study. Park H; Kim S; Nussbaum MA; Srinivasan D Appl Ergon; 2022 Jan; 98():103589. PubMed ID: 34563748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Solutions of Adopting Exoskeletons and Exosuits in Construction Workplaces. Mahmud D; Bennett ST; Zhu Z; Adamczyk PG; Wehner M; Veeramani D; Dai F Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relevance of hazards in exoskeleton applications: a survey-based enquiry. Massardi S; Pinto-Fernandez D; Babič J; Dežman M; Trošt A; Grosu V; Lefeber D; Rodriguez C; Bessler J; Schaake L; Prange-Lasonder G; Veneman JF; Torricelli D J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 May; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 37259115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives of End Users on the Potential Use of Trunk Exoskeletons for People With Low-Back Pain: A Focus Group Study. Baltrusch SJ; Houdijk H; van Dieën JH; van Bennekom CAM; de Kruif AJTCM Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):365-376. PubMed ID: 31914327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exoskeletons for Personal Use After Spinal Cord Injury. Kandilakis C; Sasso-Lance E Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 102(2):331-337. PubMed ID: 31228407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]