164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37942535)
21. Investigation of hearing aid fitting according to the national acoustic laboratories' prescription for non-linear hearing aids and the desired sensation level methods in Japanese speakers: a crossover-controlled trial.
Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Nitta Y; Umehara S; Hara Y; Yamashita T
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Oct; 50(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 36792399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.
Perry TT; Nelson PB; Van Tasell DJ
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837124. PubMed ID: 30880645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH; Ricketts TA
Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
Keidser G; Grant F
Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
Mueller HG
Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cogmed Training Does Not Generalize to Real-World Benefits for Adult Hearing Aid Users: Results of a Blinded, Active-Controlled Randomized Trial.
Henshaw H; Heinrich A; Tittle A; Ferguson M
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):741-763. PubMed ID: 34524150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does probe-tube verification of real-ear hearing aid amplification characteristics improve outcomes in adult hearing aid users? A protocol for a systematic review.
Almufarrij I; Munro KJ; Dillon H
BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e038113. PubMed ID: 32690533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Almufarrij I; Dillon H; Munro KJ
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521999563. PubMed ID: 33899603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adaptive Hearing Aid Benefit in Children With Mild/Moderate Hearing Loss: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Stewart HJ; Cash EK; Pinkl J; Nakeva von Mentzer C; Lin L; Hunter LL; Moore DR;
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1402-1415. PubMed ID: 35758427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
