127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37943114)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients and the risk of overtreatment in prostate cancer: a grading issue.
Jabbour T; Peltier A; Rocq L; Sirtaine N; Lefebvre Y; Bourgeno H; Baudewyns A; Roumeguère T; Diamand R
BJU Int; 2024 Apr; 133(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 37943114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct comparison between Grade Group assessed on systematic and MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies correlated to the radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.
Payrard-Starck C; Fourcade A; An Nguyen T; Tissot V; Doucet L; Marolleau J; Lucas C; Fournier G; Valeri A
Prog Urol; 2023 Apr; 33(5):265-271. PubMed ID: 36740508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy - A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen.
Guimarães T; Gil M; Medeiros M; Andrade V; Guerra J; Pinheiro H; Fernandes F; Pina J; Lopes Dias J; Campos Pinheiro L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Sep; 94(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 36165470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multicentric study on accurate grading of prostate cancer with systematic and MRI/US fusion targeted biopsies: comparison with final histopathology after radical prostatectomy.
Diamand R; Oderda M; Al Hajj Obeid W; Albisinni S; Van Velthoven R; Fasolis G; Simone G; Ferriero M; Roche JB; Piechaud T; Pastore A; Carbone A; Fiard G; Descotes JL; Marra G; Gontero P; Altobelli E; Papalia R; Kumar P; Eldred-Evans D; Giacobbe A; Muto G; Lacetera V; Beatrici V; Roumeguere T; Peltier A
World J Urol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):2109-2117. PubMed ID: 30652213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
Yilmaz EC; Lin Y; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Merriman KM; Hazen LA; Garcia C; Johnson L; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Patel KR; Parnes HL; Law YM; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329964. PubMed ID: 37729551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Extraprostatic Extension Be Predicted by Tumor-Capsule Contact Length in Prostate Cancer? Relationship With International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.
Bakir B; Onay A; Vural M; Armutlu A; Yıldız SÖ; Esen T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):588-596. PubMed ID: 31670596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeting on Pathologic Upgrading and Downgrading at Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Weinstein IC; Wu X; Hill A; Brennan D; Omil-Lima D; Basourakos S; Brant A; Lewicki P; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Spratt D; Bittencourt LK; Scherr D; Zaorsky NG; Nagar H; Hu J; Barbieri C; Ponsky L; Vickers AJ; Shoag JE
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 6(4):355-365. PubMed ID: 37236832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.
Sorce G; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Mazzone E; Mattei A; Afferi L; Serni S; Minervini A; Roumiguiè M; Malavaud B; Valerio M; Rakauskas A; Marra G; Gontero P; Porpiglia F; Guo H; Zhuang J; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):248. PubMed ID: 38647689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of perilesional and multiparametric resonance imaging-targeted biopsies to reduce the risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy pathology: A retrospective monocentric study.
Diamand R; Hollans M; Lefebvre Y; Sirtaine N; Limani K; Hawaux E; Abou Zahr R; Mattlet A; Albisinni S; Roumeguère T; Peltier A
Urol Oncol; 2022 May; 40(5):192.e11-192.e17. PubMed ID: 35236622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does Overgrading on Targeted Biopsy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-visible Lesions in Prostate Cancer Lead to Overtreatment?
Baboudjian M; Diamand R; Uleri A; Beauval JB; Touzani A; Roche JB; Lacetera V; Roumeguère T; Simone G; Benamran D; Fourcade A; Gondran-Tellier B; Fiard G; Peltier A; Ploussard G
Eur Urol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38494379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and prostate cancer grading accuracy.
Diamand R; Peltier A; Roche JB; Lievore E; Lacetera V; Chiacchio G; Beatrici V; Mastroianni R; Simone G; Windisch O; Benamran D; Fourcade A; Nguyen TA; Fournier G; Fiard G; Ploussard G; Roumeguère T; Albisinni S
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 36509932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological features of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 MRI lesions in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rahota RG; Diamand R; Malavaud B; Fiard G; Descotes JL; Peltier A; Beauval JB; Roumeguère T; Roumiguié M; Albisinni S; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):621-626. PubMed ID: 34358405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.
Kesch C; Pantea V; Soeterik T; Marquis A; la Bombarda G; Morlacco A; Barletta F; Radtke JP; Darr C; Preisser F; Zattoni F; Marra G; van den Bergh RCN; Hadaschik B; Gandaglia G;
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 36534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy may overestimate gleason grade on final surgical pathology and impact risk stratification.
Yu A; Yamany T; Mojtahed A; Hanna N; Nicaise E; Harisinghani M; Wu CL; Dahl DM; Wszolek M; Blute ML; Feldman AS
Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):59.e1-59.e5. PubMed ID: 34544650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The modified International Society of Urological Pathology system improves concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy tumour grade.
Hennes DMZB; Sewell J; Kerger M; Hovens CM; Peters JS; Costello AJ; Ryan A; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128 Suppl 3():45-51. PubMed ID: 34310033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].
Zhu LY; Ding XF; Huang TB; Luan Y; Guo CH; Xu YZ; Wang F
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 100(34):2663-2668. PubMed ID: 32921014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
