These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37943842)

  • 1. Using cellular device location data to estimate visitation to public lands: Comparing device location data to U.S. National Park Service's visitor use statistics.
    Tsai WL; Merrill NH; Neale AC; Grupper M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0289922. PubMed ID: 37943842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the validity of mobile device data for estimating visitor demographics and visitation patterns in Yellowstone National Park.
    Liang Y; Yin J; Pan B; Lin MS; Miller L; Taff BD; Chi G
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Sep; 317():115410. PubMed ID: 35751247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreased air quality shows minimal influence on peak summer attendance at forested Pacific West national parks.
    Brown M; Jenkins J; Kolden C
    J Environ Manage; 2024 May; 358():120702. PubMed ID: 38631165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protected Area Tourism in a Changing Climate: Will Visitation at US National Parks Warm Up or Overheat?
    Fisichelli NA; Schuurman GW; Monahan WB; Ziesler PS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128226. PubMed ID: 26083361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The REVAMP natural experiment study: the impact of a play-scape installation on park visitation and park-based physical activity.
    Veitch J; Salmon J; Crawford D; Abbott G; Giles-Corti B; Carver A; Timperio A
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2018 Jan; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 29368610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recreational use in dispersed public lands measured using social media data and on-site counts.
    Fisher DM; Wood SA; White EM; Blahna DJ; Lange S; Weinberg A; Tomco M; Lia E
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 222():465-474. PubMed ID: 29908477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social media influences National Park visitation.
    Wichman CJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Apr; 121(15):e2310417121. PubMed ID: 38557173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bringing forecasting into the future: Using Google to predict visitation in U.S. national parks.
    Clark M; Wilkins EJ; Dagan DT; Powell R; Sharp RL; Hillis V
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():88-94. PubMed ID: 31082755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring recreational visitation at U.S. National Parks with crowd-sourced photographs.
    Sessions C; Wood SA; Rabotyagov S; Fisher DM
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):703-711. PubMed ID: 27641652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Valuation of national park system visitation: the efficient use of count data models, meta-analysis, and secondary visitor survey data.
    Neher C; Duffield J; Patterson D
    Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 52(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 23716008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human mobility data demonstrates increase in park visitation since start of COVID-19 pandemic in Buffalo, New York.
    Tirabassi JN; Wang J; Zhenqi Zhou R; Hu Y
    Prev Med Rep; 2024 Mar; 39():102650. PubMed ID: 38380386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using data derived from cellular phone locations to estimate visitation to natural areas: An application to water recreation in New England, USA.
    Merrill NH; Atkinson SF; Mulvaney KK; Mazzotta MJ; Bousquin J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231863. PubMed ID: 32352978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia.
    Veitch J; Carver A; Abbott G; Giles-Corti B; Timperio A; Salmon J
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Jul; 15():610. PubMed ID: 26141112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change of urban park usage as a response to the COVID-19 global pandemic.
    Zhao H; Mailloux BJ; Cook EM; Culligan PJ
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19324. PubMed ID: 37935778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. COVID-19's impact on visitation behavior to US national parks from communities of color: evidence from mobile phone data.
    Alba C; Pan B; Yin J; Rice WL; Mitra P; Lin MS; Liang Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13398. PubMed ID: 35927271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Associations Between Visitation, Social Media Use, and Search and Rescue in United States National Parks.
    Lu ZN; Briggs A; Saadat S; Algaze IM
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2021 Dec; 32(4):463-467. PubMed ID: 34629292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uses and Limitations of Social Media to Inform Visitor Use Management in Parks and Protected Areas: A Systematic Review.
    Wilkins EJ; Wood SA; Smith JW
    Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 67(1):120-132. PubMed ID: 33063153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Next-generation visitation models using social media to estimate recreation on public lands.
    Wood SA; Winder SG; Lia EH; White EM; Crowley CSL; Milnor AA
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15419. PubMed ID: 32963262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public parks and the pandemic: How park usage has been affected by COVID-19 policies.
    Volenec ZM; Abraham JO; Becker AD; Dobson AP
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251799. PubMed ID: 34010353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
    Talal ML; Santelmann MV
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02079. PubMed ID: 31972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.