These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. How accurate is Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there a nonnegligible effect of maximum standardized uptake value in the staging and management of prostate cancer with 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography imaging? A single-center experience. Ekmekcioglu O; Yavuzsan AH; Arican P; Kirecci SL J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(6):1351-1357. PubMed ID: 34916365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging. Ma TM; Gafita A; Shabsovich D; Juarez J; Grogan TR; Thin P; Armstrong W; Sonni I; Nguyen K; Lok V; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Steinberg ML; Kupelian PA; Yang DD; Muralidhar V; Chu C; Feng F; Savjani R; Deng J; Parikh NR; Nickols NG; Elashoff D; Czernin J; Calais J; Kishan AU Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):100-103. PubMed ID: 33602654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer in Australia. Song R; Jeet V; Sharma R; Hoyle M; Parkinson B Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Aug; 40(8):807-821. PubMed ID: 35761117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature. Luiting HB; van Leeuwen PJ; Busstra MB; Brabander T; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Vis AN; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Roobol MJ BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of uptake time on image quality of [ van der Sar ECA; Viol SLM; Braat AJAT; van Rooij R; Lam MGEH; de Jong HWAM; de Keizer B Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7619-7628. PubMed ID: 37093883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit. Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]