188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37944107)
1. Experiences and intentions of patients undergoing medically indicated oocyte or embryo cryopreservation: a qualitative study.
Bayefsky MJ; Sampson A; Blakemore JK; Jalili D; Lilly AG; Fino ME; Quinn GP
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 37944107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers.
Stoop D; Maes E; Polyzos NP; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Nekkebroeck J
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 25432922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Loreti S; Darici E; Nekkebroeck J; Drakopoulos P; Van Landuyt L; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 38145619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?
Bredkjaer HE; Grudzinskas JG
Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection.
Johnston M; Richings NM; Leung A; Sakkas D; Catt S
Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 36(3):624-635. PubMed ID: 33367704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive choices and outcomes after freezing oocytes for medical reasons: a follow-up study.
Dahhan T; Dancet EA; Miedema DV; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 24951490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons.
Hammarberg K; Kirkman M; Pritchard N; Hickey M; Peate M; McBain J; Agresta F; Bayly C; Fisher J
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 28077428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical models.
Mascarenhas M; Mehlawat H; Kirubakaran R; Bhandari H; Choudhary M
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1416-1426. PubMed ID: 33313698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transgender men's experiences of fertility preservation: a qualitative study.
Armuand G; Dhejne C; Olofsson JI; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 27999119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancing the scope of in vitro maturation for fertility preservation: transvaginal retrieval of immature oocytes during endoscopic gynaecological procedures.
Song XL; Lu CL; Zheng XY; Nisenblat V; Zhen XM; Yang R; Li M; Li R; Yuan YF; Ma CH; Liu P; Feng HL; Yan J; Qiao J
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):837-846. PubMed ID: 32154563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey of Reproductive Experiences and Outcomes of Cancer Survivors Who Stored Reproductive Material Before Treatment.
Hammarberg K; Kirkman M; Stern C; McLachlan RI; Clarke G; Agresta F; Gook D; Rombauts L; Vollenhoven B; Fisher JRW
Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2423-2430. PubMed ID: 29045667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: the crucial role of symbolic embryo representation.
Bruno C; Dudkiewicz-Sibony C; Berthaut I; Weil E; Brunet L; Fortier C; Pfeffer J; Ravel C; Fauque P; Mathieu E; Antoine JM; Kotti S; Mandelbaum J
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1508-14. PubMed ID: 27165623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.
Brouillet S; Ranisavljevic N; Sonigo C; Haquet E; Bringer-Deutsch S; Loup-Cabaniols V; Hamamah S; Willems M; Anahory T
Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 37381072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sperm cryopreservation does not affect live birth rate in normozoospermic men: analysis of 7969 oocyte donation cycles.
Torra-Massana M; Vassena R; Rodríguez A
Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):400-407. PubMed ID: 36661036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Season at the time of oocyte collection and frozen embryo transfer outcomes.
Leathersich SJ; Roche CS; Walls M; Nathan E; Hart RJ
Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1714-1722. PubMed ID: 37407029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel transnational fresh oocyte donation (TOD) program based on transport of frozen sperm and embryos.
La Marca A; Dal Canto M; Buccheri M; Valerio M; Mignini Renzini M; Rodriguez A; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):285-290. PubMed ID: 30520998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
