BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37944212)

  • 21. [Cesarean scar pregnancy analysis of 42 cases].
    Yin L; Tao X; Zhu YC; Yu XL; Zou YH; Yang HX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):566-9. PubMed ID: 20003781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign.
    Cali G; Forlani F; Timor-Tritsch IE; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Minneci G; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 50(1):100-104. PubMed ID: 27420402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases.
    Pan Y; Liu MB
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 56(2):139-142. PubMed ID: 28420496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uterine-fundal hypoechoic mass: a possible ultrasound sign for cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Takahashi H; Usui R; Suzuki H; Baba Y; Suzuki T; Kuwata T; Ohkuchi A; Matsubara S
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2017; 44(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 29714873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recurrent Cesarean scar pregnancy: case series and literature review.
    Timor-Tritsch IE; Horwitz G; D'Antonio F; Monteagudo A; Bornstein E; Chervenak J; Messina L; Morlando M; Cali G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 58(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 33411387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Chueh HY; Pai AH; Su YY; Hsu CC; Chang FY; Yen CF
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):643-645. PubMed ID: 35219475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic approach for a cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Karampelas S; Engels S; Birbarah C; Nisolle M
    Fertil Steril; 2022 May; 117(5):1099-1101. PubMed ID: 35361484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Value of first-trimester ultrasound in prediction of third-trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome.
    Calí G; Timor-Tritsch IE; Forlani F; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Monteagudo A; Kaelin Agten A; Flacco ME; Khalil A; Buca D; Manzoli L; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 31788885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review on expectant management.
    Silva B; Viana Pinto P; Costa MA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Sep; 288():36-43. PubMed ID: 37421745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Treatment of Residual Ectopic Pregnancy in a Previous Cesarean Section Scar: A Case Report.
    Schmitt A; Crochet P; Agostini A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):342-343. PubMed ID: 27544880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Management of caesarean scar pregnancy with high dose intravenous methotrexate infusion therapy: 10-year experience at a single tertiary centre.
    Tanaka K; Coghill E; Ballard E; Sekar R; Amoako A; Khalil A; Baartz D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jun; 237():28-32. PubMed ID: 30999082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conservative management of Caesarean scar pregnancies with systemic multidose methotrexate: predictors of treatment failure and reproductive outcomes.
    Levin G; Zigron R; Dior UP; Gilad R; Shushan A; Benshushan A; Rottenstreich A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Nov; 39(5):827-834. PubMed ID: 31530445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Different treatment modalities and outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 31 cases in a unıversity hospital.
    Orhan A; Kasapoğlu I; Çetinkaya Demir B; Özerkan K; Duzok N; Uncu G
    Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(6):291-307. PubMed ID: 31276180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incorporating uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy following diagnostic ultrasonography.
    Li Y; Wang W; Yang T; Wei X; Yang X
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 134(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 27126907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scar Tissue after a Cesarean Section-The Management of Different Complications in Pregnant Women.
    Stupak A; Kondracka A; Fronczek A; Kwaśniewska A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of location on placentation in live tubal and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.
    Jauniaux E; Mavrelos D; De Braud LV; Dooley W; Knez J; Jurkovic D
    Placenta; 2021 May; 108():109-113. PubMed ID: 33862520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing the clinical efficacy of three surgical methods for cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Zeng S; Wang Y; Ye P; Xu L; Han W; Li F; Tang C; Zhou J; Xie X
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 May; 23(1):271. PubMed ID: 37198658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.
    Gao L; Huang Z; Zhang X; Zhou N; Huang X; Wang X
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():102-7. PubMed ID: 27014853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Liu D; Yang M; Wu Q
    Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Nov; 486():291-297. PubMed ID: 30102898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic CSP Resection and Hysterotomy Repair.
    Ye M; Zhang Q; Li Z; Gu C; Meng Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):945-946. PubMed ID: 33253958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.