These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37944323)

  • 1. Effective correction of misinformation.
    Prike T; Ecker UKH
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2023 Dec; 54():101712. PubMed ID: 37944323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines.
    Kemp PL; Loaiza VM; Wahlheim CN
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21829. PubMed ID: 36528666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ingraining Polio Vaccine Acceptance through Public Service Advertisements in the Digital Era: The Moderating Role of Misinformation, Disinformation, Fake News, and Religious Fatalism.
    Jin Q; Raza SH; Yousaf M; Munawar R; Shah AA; Hassan S; Shaikh RS; Ogadimma EC
    Vaccines (Basel); 2022 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36298598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections.
    Prike T; Blackley P; Swire-Thompson B; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):39. PubMed ID: 37395864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?
    Connor Desai S; Reimers S
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):422-436. PubMed ID: 36125658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.
    Tay LQ; Hurlstone MJ; Kurz T; Ecker UKH
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):591-607. PubMed ID: 34967004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?
    van der Linden S; Roozenbeek J; Maertens R; Basol M; Kácha O; Rathje S; Traberg CS
    Span J Psychol; 2021 Apr; 24():e25. PubMed ID: 33840397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News.
    Batailler C; Brannon SM; Teas PE; Gawronski B
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):78-98. PubMed ID: 34264150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
    Giotakos O
    Psychiatriki; 2022 Sep; 33(3):183-186. PubMed ID: 35947862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study.
    Greene CM; Murphy G
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280295. PubMed ID: 36662686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening to Misinformation while Driving: Cognitive Load and the Effectiveness of (Repeated) Corrections.
    Sanderson JA; Bowden V; Swire-Thompson B; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    J Appl Res Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 12(3):325-334. PubMed ID: 37829768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refuting misinformation: Examining theoretical underpinnings of refutational interventions.
    Amazeen MA; Krishna A
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101774. PubMed ID: 38101246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scrolling through fake news: The effect of presentation order on misinformation retention.
    Edelijn Y; Øvreeide VD; Verheyen S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Mar; 30(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 37227873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.
    Mourali M; Drake C
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e34831. PubMed ID: 35156933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.
    Chan MS; Jones CR; Hall Jamieson K; Albarracín D
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1531-1546. PubMed ID: 28895452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the effects of simple and refutational narratives in misinformation correction: The moderating roles of correction placement and issue involvement.
    Wang W; Huang Y
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Nov; 32(8):985-1002. PubMed ID: 37194942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining Misinformation and Related Terms in Health-Related Literature: Scoping Review.
    El Mikati IK; Hoteit R; Harb T; El Zein O; Piggott T; Melki J; Mustafa RA; Akl EA
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e45731. PubMed ID: 37556184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.
    Kemp PL; Goldman AC; Wahlheim CN
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101783. PubMed ID: 38171060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fake news, misinformation, disinformation and supply chain risks and disruptions: risk management and resilience using blockchain.
    Petratos PN; Faccia A
    Ann Oper Res; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37361081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.