BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37946053)

  • 21. Mitigating fugitive methane emissions from closed landfills: A pilot-scale field study.
    Nelson B; Zytner RG; Dulac Y; Cabral AR
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 851(Pt 2):158351. PubMed ID: 36049680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing methods to estimate emissions of non-methane organic compounds from landfills.
    Saquing JM; Chanton JP; Yazdani R; Barlaz MA; Scheutz C; Blake DR; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2260-70. PubMed ID: 25108756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measured gas emissions from four landfills in south africa and some implications for landfill design and methane recovery in semi-arid climates.
    Fourie AB; Morris JW
    Waste Manag Res; 2004 Dec; 22(6):440-53. PubMed ID: 15666447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Greenhouse gas emissions from semi-aerobic bioreactor landfills with different vent-pipe diameters.
    Jiang G; Liu D; Chen W; Han Z; Li Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17563-17572. PubMed ID: 33400112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating methane emissions from landfills based on rainfall, ambient temperature, and waste composition: The CLEEN model.
    Karanjekar RV; Bhatt A; Altouqui S; Jangikhatoonabad N; Durai V; Sattler ML; Hossain MD; Chen V
    Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():389-98. PubMed ID: 26346020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of stabilization status of the landfill layers by comparing long-term monitoring data of methane emission with FOD model estimate.
    Nishio T; Fukuyama J; Fukunaga I; Nishitani T; Takakura A; Sakai M; Masuda J
    Environ Technol; 2024 Jul; 45(18):3679-3691. PubMed ID: 37317953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of landfill gases by LandGEM and energy recovery potential from municipal solid waste of Kanpur city, India.
    Chandra S; Ganguly R
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15187. PubMed ID: 37089347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biosolid stockpiles are a significant point source for greenhouse gas emissions.
    Majumder R; Livesley SJ; Gregory D; Arndt SK
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Oct; 143():34-43. PubMed ID: 24835360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of correction factors for landfill gas emission model suiting Indian condition to predict methane emission from landfills.
    Sil A; Kumar S; Wong JW
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Sep; 168():97-9. PubMed ID: 24685512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantification of landfill gas emissions and energy production potential in Tirupati Municipal solid waste disposal site by LandGEM mathematical model.
    Ramprasad C; Teja HC; Gowtham V; Vikas V
    MethodsX; 2022; 9():101869. PubMed ID: 36204474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of methane gas by LandGEM model from Yasuj municipal solid waste landfill, Iran.
    Fallahizadeh S; Rahmatinia M; Mohammadi Z; Vaezzadeh M; Tajamiri A; Soleimani H
    MethodsX; 2019; 6():391-398. PubMed ID: 30906697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methane emissions from trees planted on a closed landfill site.
    Fraser-McDonald A; Boardman C; Gladding T; Burnley S; Gauci V
    Waste Manag Res; 2022 Nov; 40(11):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 35380070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations.
    Anshassi M; Smallwood T; Townsend TG
    Waste Manag; 2022 Apr; 142():44-54. PubMed ID: 35176598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a biologically active cover for mitigation of landfill gas emissions.
    Barlaz MA; Green RB; Chanton JP; Goldsmith CD; Hater GR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Sep; 38(18):4891-9. PubMed ID: 15487801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial variability of nitrous oxide and methane emissions from an MBT landfill in operation: strong N2O hotspots at the working face.
    Harborth P; Fuss R; Münnich K; Flessa H; Fricke K
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2099-107. PubMed ID: 23453435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigation of fugitive methane and gas collection efficiency in Halton landfill in Ontario, Canada.
    Mohsen RA; Abbassi B; Zytner R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 May; 192(6):326. PubMed ID: 32363444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of greenhouse gas emissions from Ontario's solid waste landfills using fuzzy logic based model.
    Mohsen RA; Abbassi B
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():743-750. PubMed ID: 31805447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantification of parameters influencing methane generation due to biodegradation of municipal solid waste in landfills and laboratory experiments.
    Fei X; Zekkos D; Raskin L
    Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():276-87. PubMed ID: 26525969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills - A review.
    Mønster J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():835-859. PubMed ID: 30660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alternative carbon dioxide modelling approaches accounting for high residual gases in LandGEM.
    Bruce N; Ng KTW; Richter A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jun; 24(16):14322-14336. PubMed ID: 28429269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.