These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37947308)

  • 1. FitMultiCell: simulating and parameterizing computational models of multi-scale and multi-cellular processes.
    Alamoudi E; Schälte Y; Müller R; Starruß J; Bundgaard N; Graw F; Brusch L; Hasenauer J
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 37947308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. pyABC: distributed, likelihood-free inference.
    Klinger E; Rickert D; Hasenauer J
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(20):3591-3593. PubMed ID: 29762723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient exact inference for dynamical systems with noisy measurements using sequential approximate Bayesian computation.
    Schälte Y; Hasenauer J
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i551-i559. PubMed ID: 32657404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GpABC: a Julia package for approximate Bayesian computation with Gaussian process emulation.
    Tankhilevich E; Ish-Horowicz J; Hameed T; Roesch E; Kleijn I; Stumpf MPH; He F
    Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(10):3286-3287. PubMed ID: 32022854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parallelization and High-Performance Computing Enables Automated Statistical Inference of Multi-scale Models.
    Jagiella N; Rickert D; Theis FJ; Hasenauer J
    Cell Syst; 2017 Feb; 4(2):194-206.e9. PubMed ID: 28089542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Topological approximate Bayesian computation for parameter inference of an angiogenesis model.
    Thorne T; Kirk PDW; Harrington HA
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 38(9):2529-2535. PubMed ID: 35191485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ABC-SysBio--approximate Bayesian computation in Python with GPU support.
    Liepe J; Barnes C; Cule E; Erguler K; Kirk P; Toni T; Stumpf MP
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jul; 26(14):1797-9. PubMed ID: 20591907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood free inference for Markov processes: a comparison.
    Owen J; Wilkinson DJ; Gillespie CS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Apr; 14(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 25720092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AABC: approximate approximate Bayesian computation for inference in population-genetic models.
    Buzbas EO; Rosenberg NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Feb; 99():31-42. PubMed ID: 25261426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. al3c: high-performance software for parameter inference using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Stram AH; Marjoram P; Chen GK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 31(21):3549-51. PubMed ID: 26142186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient parametric inference for stochastic biological systems with measured variability.
    Johnston IG
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Jun; 13(3):379-90. PubMed ID: 24821877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for parameter estimation and model selection from experimental data in systems biology using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Liepe J; Kirk P; Filippi S; Toni T; Barnes CP; Stumpf MP
    Nat Protoc; 2014 Feb; 9(2):439-56. PubMed ID: 24457334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems.
    Toni T; Welch D; Strelkowa N; Ipsen A; Stumpf MP
    J R Soc Interface; 2009 Feb; 6(31):187-202. PubMed ID: 19205079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian parameter inference and model selection by population annealing in systems biology.
    Murakami Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104057. PubMed ID: 25089832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advanced computational workflow for the multi-scale modeling of the bone metabolic processes.
    Dao TT
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Jun; 55(6):923-933. PubMed ID: 27638110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Emulation to Engineer and Understand Simulations of Biological Systems.
    Alden K; Cosgrove J; Coles M; Timmis J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(1):302-315. PubMed ID: 29994223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automating approximate Bayesian computation by local linear regression.
    Thornton KR
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jul; 10():35. PubMed ID: 19583871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A demonstration of modularity, reuse, reproducibility, portability and scalability for modeling and simulation of cardiac electrophysiology using Kepler Workflows.
    Yang PC; Purawat S; Ieong PU; Jeng MT; DeMarco KR; Vorobyov I; McCulloch AD; Altintas I; Amaro RE; Clancy CE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006856. PubMed ID: 30849072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient parameter estimation for ODE models of cellular processes using semi-quantitative data.
    Dorešić D; Grein S; Hasenauer J
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Jun; 40(Supplement_1):i558-i566. PubMed ID: 38940161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the limitations of standard statistical modeling in biological systems: a full Bayesian approach for biology.
    Gomez-Ramirez J; Sanz R
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2013 Sep; 113(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23542650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.