These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37947400)

  • 1. Adjusted win ratio using the inverse probability of treatment weighting.
    Wang D; Zheng S; Cui Y; He N; Chen T; Huang B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Nov; ():1-16. PubMed ID: 37947400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of inverse probability weighting using the propensity score for baseline covariate adjustment in smaller population randomised controlled trials with a continuous outcome.
    Raad H; Cornelius V; Chan S; Williamson E; Cro S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 32293286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights.
    Kostouraki A; Hajage D; Rachet B; Williamson EJ; Chauvet G; Belot A; Leyrat C
    Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2672-2694. PubMed ID: 38622063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variance reduction in randomised trials by inverse probability weighting using the propensity score.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; White IR
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(5):721-37. PubMed ID: 24114884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3661-79. PubMed ID: 26238958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical power in parallel group point exposure studies with time-to-event outcomes: an empirical comparison of the performance of randomized controlled trials and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach.
    Austin PC; Schuster T; Platt RW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26472109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of covariate adjustment approaches under model misspecification in individually randomized trials.
    Tackney MS; Morris T; White I; Leyrat C; Diaz-Ordaz K; Williamson E
    Trials; 2023 Jan; 24(1):14. PubMed ID: 36609282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring.
    Dong G; Mao L; Huang B; Gamalo-Siebers M; Wang J; Yu G; Hoaglin DC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):882-899. PubMed ID: 32552451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A win ratio approach for comparing crossing survival curves in clinical trials.
    Zheng S; Wang D; Qiu J; Chen T; Gamalo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Jul; 33(4):488-501. PubMed ID: 36749067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(30):5642-5655. PubMed ID: 27549016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database.
    Chen Q; Li M; Wang P; Chen J; Zhao H; Zhao J
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():696732. PubMed ID: 34367980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjusting win statistics for dependent censoring.
    Dong G; Huang B; Wang D; Verbeeck J; Wang J; Hoaglin DC
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):440-450. PubMed ID: 33247544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?
    Rauch G; Brannath W; Brückner M; Kieser M
    Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):89-100. PubMed ID: 29719915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint modeling of concurrent binary outcomes in a longitudinal observational study using inverse probability of treatment weighting for treatment effect estimation.
    Agogo GO; Murphy TE; McAvay GJ; Allore HG
    Ann Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 35():53-58. PubMed ID: 31085069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiply robust causal inference of the restricted mean survival time difference.
    Shu D; Mukhopadhyay S; Uno H; Gerber JS; Schaubel DE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2386-2404. PubMed ID: 37965684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for estimating subgroup effects in cost-effectiveness analyses that use observational data.
    Kreif N; Grieve R; Radice R; Sadique Z; Ramsahai R; Sekhon JS
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(6):750-63. PubMed ID: 22691446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stratified proportional win-fractions regression analysis.
    Wang T; Mao L
    Stat Med; 2022 Nov; 41(26):5305-5318. PubMed ID: 36104953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More robust estimation of average treatment effects using kernel optimal matching in an observational study of spine surgical interventions.
    Kallus N; Pennicooke B; Santacatterina M
    Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(10):2305-2320. PubMed ID: 33665870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.